Stuliasz Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 The awards for the game against Stoke City are now on the web site. Go to Player-Ratings.co.uk to see them. Look out tomorrow for the Ipswich match preview
Scow Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Wow, I'm a fair voter. Keep up the good work Sheff, the site is coming along nicely.
Hitesh Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Good work Sheff! Keep it up! I think its a bit unfair about the ratings on Sylla because i dont many of us knew he was injured. I only wondered if he had when he got taken off but just thought it could of been fitness etc.
Scow Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Good work Sheff! Keep it up!I think its a bit unfair about the ratings on Sylla because i dont many of us knew he was injured. I only wondered if he had when he got taken off but just thought it could of been fitness etc. 155215[/snapback] Irrespective of whether he was injured or not, that shouldn't affect our thoughts on how he played. He should have come off earlier if he knew he was injured.
Hitesh Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Irrespective of whether he was injured or not, that shouldn't affect our thoughts on how he played. He should have come off earlier if he knew he was injured. 155230[/snapback] True, but Williams had a knock on his toe but he went on to have a good game so maybe Sylla was trying to run it off. He started alright actually but it was early in the second half when he didnt run as much as he did in the first. But i agree with what your saying Scowy!
Ricey Posted 12 August 2005 Posted 12 August 2005 Good stuff Sheff, your site is always an interesting read.
Anish Posted 12 August 2005 Posted 12 August 2005 Well done Sheff. One thing that I noticed, however, was the Peter Gilbert was voted flop of the match (with a rating of 7.10) from the people who listened on the radio, but it was Nils Eric Johansson who won the defender of the match (from the same people who listened on radio) with a rating of 6.92. How does that work?
Stuliasz Posted 12 August 2005 Author Posted 12 August 2005 It was a typo on my part, should now read 6.10. Thanks for letting me know guys
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.