lookwhaticando Posted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005 Former Wales striker Nathan Blake has been suspended from all football for six months after failing a drug test.... Blake, who counts Man City, Blackburn and Cardiff as former clubs, tested positive for a recreational drug. Source: BBC Football
Little Nicky Posted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005 Twaaaaat I hate the guy, appauling player for us!
BenFilbert Posted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005 TwaaaaatI hate the guy, appauling player for us! 161744[/snapback] How can you say that?! He hardly ever played to be judged as appalling for us.
rossporterlc Posted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005 But he was appalling when he did play. 161826[/snapback] very true, contributed nothing to the team
lookwhaticando Posted 23 August 2005 Author Posted 23 August 2005 He contributed nothing apart from an extra drain on the wage bill
step Posted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005 He contributed nothing apart from an extra drain on the wage bill 161875[/snapback] Probably because he was totally chilled out on the weed
Head Honcho Posted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005 Well i've been to a few parties where he has been in attendance and let's just say i'm not surprised
Hitesh Posted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005 Probably because he was totally chilled out on the weed 161881[/snapback] Its disgracefuly though and not good for football at all. I hope he gets banned for longer! Doesnt portray the right image at all especially to kids.
Bluefoxtim Posted 23 August 2005 Posted 23 August 2005 What an idiot! Anyone else notice his HUGE arse? Looked like two badly parked buses
Guest Posted 24 August 2005 Posted 24 August 2005 It was the reason his contract was terminated by City.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 24 August 2005 Posted 24 August 2005 It was the reason his contract was terminated by City. 162295[/snapback] I hope him being cack had something to do with it too.
Guest Posted 24 August 2005 Posted 24 August 2005 I hope him being cack had something to do with it too. 162413[/snapback] From what I heard, it wasn't.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 24 August 2005 Posted 24 August 2005 From what I heard, it wasn't. 162416[/snapback] You mean we would have re-signed him if he hadn't have been doped up to the eyeballs? I suppose we did re-sign Wilcox. Christ, what a thought.
Guest Posted 24 August 2005 Posted 24 August 2005 You mean we would have re-signed him if he hadn't have been doped up to the eyeballs? I suppose we did re-sign Wilcox. Christ, what a thought. 162420[/snapback] Perhaps it's endemic within the club? We haven't been in the papers for a while, so.....
King Kyle lcfc Posted 24 August 2005 Posted 24 August 2005 But he's not even got a team has he so the ban will be extremely punishing he cant play football for 6 months does that include Hinckley utd when he signs for them
Teeno Posted 24 August 2005 Posted 24 August 2005 Source: BBC Football 161663[/snapback] Remember hearing about this towards the end of last season, what a waste.
Katy Posted 25 August 2005 Posted 25 August 2005 Its not as if he didnt know the implications and consequences of a footballer taking drugs. What a div
lookwhaticando Posted 25 August 2005 Author Posted 25 August 2005 Its not as if he didnt know the implications and consequences of a footballer taking drugs. What a div 163214[/snapback] Well he aint the brightest person around, so he might not have known
lookwhaticando Posted 25 August 2005 Author Posted 25 August 2005 But he's not even got a team has he so the ban will be extremely punishing he cant play football for 6 months does that include Hinckley utd when he signs for them 162441[/snapback] 6 months takes us to February. By that time, the Trees will be in a relegation scrap at the foot of Leage One - so maybe he could do a job for them... ... hook them up with his dealer so they can forget about their troubles.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.