Robo61

That really depend on your definrion of effective is. If winning elections from low base is your measure then difficult to disagree. If bringing good things for the people you represent, then I struggle to see onthe opposirmte isn't true. Unfortunatley so many people today it is the first measure, yet until the last 10 years or so the second was all that mattered when meauring the success of politicians.

I hope ypu are right, but I have very little faith in the authorities to deal with this sort of thing, when it involves Farage. There is no chance any other propsective PM would be allowed to host a politics show on a TV news channel, but he gets away with it. Balls my piss that the MSM had Starmer and Reeves donotions of what amounted to half a small wardrobe of clothing, on the fromt pages for weeks, but so little of the milions Farage regularly recieves in donations, seems it only matters if corruption occurs on the left.

New MPs are required to declare any donation in the previous 12 months, so that simply does not wash.

Unprecedented?????? It would have been had we sold out of season tickets in the 3rd division. The club had been around over 100 years before 2014 and as far as I understand it, that was the first year they sold out of STs.

36.25% ((549-404)/404)to be precise, which is nearer to 40% than 30%. The Vast majority season ticket holders will get the lower price as most are renewing and in any case it will be the cheaper price in thre second year.

You don't think Wolves have made poor signings??. Unfortunately clubs like ours have to take risks in the transfer market sometimes they pay off, sometimes they don't. I agree we should be doing better, but this narrative that KP is to blame for everything from bad signings to world peace puts those of us who are on the fence re the future direction of the club.

Yes at a cost to their fans 40% of ours for this season, would you have accepted a price rise in that region had we stayed up. I don't doubt KP have questions to answer, but ticket pricing isn't one of them. Blaming everything wrong in the world today on them does not cause of those that wish KP gone, as fans like me who neither support or hate them are put off this constant KP are the only problem this football club has and therefore eveything can be blamed on them.

Sorry but clubs need to maximise revenue at all levels, it is not just about whether we can or anyone else can buy one single player. Such additional revenue over three years, could have gone a very long way to the club meeting its PFI obligations.

A more intersting headline would be Wolves cheapest season ticket nearly 40% more expensive than the Foxes. But don't let a headline get in the way of knocking KP. Foxes fans need to get real about pricing, if you really want to have KP replaced by someone with ambition you need to be prepared to pay more for your tickets I am afraid.

Playing my first singles strokeplay competition of the year today, wish me luck, I feel I might need it.

You might want to amend that first dates, pretty sure you are not looking into the future

Did he not appoint the son of a former KGB agent to the House of Lords.

I delusion of grandeur that most fans had at the time, which is why I have a modicom of sympathy with KP. Don't really care whether they stay or go at this stage, either way over time the club will recover to be near where they have been for the last 130 odd years.

Not any more, I believe around 20 years ago it was though. The greens were rapid for a couple of months each summer, but were very inconsistent throughout the year and were rarely used during the winter months the greenkeeper preferring members play off temps. More consistency now, and we haven't played off temps at all for the last couple of years.

Indeed he is

I am a member at Cosby and we don't have a pro by the name of Martin, I think he went to Kirby Muxloe. Our reputation is mainly down to having many very good players including around a dozen off scratch or better. Many casual golfers are not lovers off it though as it provides a very exacting test. If you fancy testing yourself, let me know.

Only if they go into administration and I don't see that happening anytime soon. This chat is looking for a fans consortium, which would suggest to me that the OP was looking for Dave and John. In any case whoever comes in will have to be willing to suffer losses as nearly all owners of football have to.

Brooks accepted an offer from the PGAT to go back, but it cost him alot of dosh and he has restricted playing rights for the next couple of years. Rahm was offered the same deal and declined to take it. If this is the demise of LiV, then any deal for Rahm to go back will be very expensive for him. The same applies to any future DPWT membership, where a number of players, including Reed & Hatton, accepted a seperate deal.

How does that answer my question? Whilst not completly discounting administration I see no signs of the owners pulling the plug and until that happens it is very unlikley to happen.

Yes they announced the outline of an agreement nearly three years ago, but negotiations since then have come to nothing, with the PGAT getting stronger over that time, its doubtful they now need any such a deal.

Can you explain to me how and where the owners have been making money from the fans. KP may be incompetent owners but they have been funding the losses, how do you propose a consortium of fans owning the club would do that.

Don't be so sensible, we all know all the inconveniences and the horrors of the world our down to Top and KP

There have been plenty of polling data showing that boomers vote reform in higher numbers than other generations, however even the majority of them believe in the science, but in my experience most have no wish to be inconvenienced by anything government would like to mitigate against it.

Filling up my car at home now costs 20% less than last month, but I'm not feeling smug, honestly😗