Jump to content


  • Post count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Robo61

  1. Except neither card now offers you cover in Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway or Switzerland.
  2. These analogy's are ridiculous when my insurance company puts the price up I can then go on to negotiate with 100's of competitors.
  3. Did I say that. The problem lies though with the fact we went into this negotiation not recognising the EU's legitimacy of their red lines. I am sure you will say the same of the EU, which is where my point comes in, we chose this negotiation not the EU.
  4. Yes of course there are two sides, but only one that wanted this negotiation.
  5. Exactly, am pretty sure this is the first negotiation in human history which essentially is about how best to reduce trade between nations.
  6. Fairness you're having a laugh, if that was to have any bearing then transfer fee's and earnings would be capped.
  7. A number spring to mind, away trips to Luton (4-1) and QPR (2-0) in the cup run of 1974 when I was just 13. The 3 goalkeepers 5-2 cup tie against Shrewsbury, madness. The 7 Wembley appearances of the 90's especially the loss against Swindon, the emotion when Steve Thompson netted the third was off the scale. Ther whole of the 2015/16 season (well at least all the home games) Both last 16 matches against Seville (including my only oversea's trip). Last but not least the win at Anfield in 1981 that broke Liverpools record run of 63 consective home matches without defeat, shame I can
  8. Guess we're just going to have to agree to disagree and I can get back to being concerned about much bigger issues in the world today.
  9. Just re-read the latest ST information and nowhere does it say there will be refunds, so clearly I have not missed anything. Dont get me wrong I can see why people complained, I just dont see it as the big deal some are making out it to be.
  10. Unless I've missed something, there will still be no refund for those that choose not to renew for 2021/22, so no change then.
  11. Unless I have missed something the update did not change this, i.e there will be no refund if you choose not to purchase a ST for either 2020/21 if these become available, or 2021/22, if they don't. All it did was confirm that the £70 could be put towards your 2021/22 ST. Yes this should have been said originally, but it is clear to me that was always going to be the case.
  12. No we would not have, as they have now made clear. Wolves charge over £100 a season more for their ST's but apparently in your eyes they look after their supporters better than our owners whose only crime seems to be a minor omission in communicating.
  13. No it was not, it was a deposit on your your ST. The original document made that clear, it simply omitted to say what would happen in the event of ST's not being available this season. This was corrected in the second document, though it changed nothing in reality. I agree that it should not have been omitted, but don't believe there was ever an intention to take money for no service.
  14. Firstly I never mentioned doughnuts etc, and would broadly agree with you on that topic, I was just pointing out that Wolves ST are significantly more expensive than ours. Secondly the offer to credit the £70 against next seasons ST if grounds aren't at full capacity by the end of this season, was not a change in policy given that the original proposal never contemplated that scenario.
  15. https://www.wolves.co.uk/media/8315/prices1920.pdf Really, my ST has cost me some £58 less than it would have done at Molyneax and I still have a £70 credit. When considering the clubs attitude to supporters we really should all try to look at the overall package.
  16. It must be remembered that our opponents have to agree to the pricing structures for Cup matches as they share the revenues. In terms of revenue this fixture will make more than if they had reduced the pricing by £5 and got a full ground. Whilst this may seem to be short sighted from the home clubs point of view the away side has maximsed its income whilst also getting the benefit of a bigger away following (by%), with no down side as far as I can see.
  17. That will be the final nail in the coffin as the already rich clubs will domunate the viewing fuiures and therefore te income. Whilst not a lover of the current system at least the coverage and revueue is spread out to a degree, when all games are televised live then the rich will just continue to get richer while clubs further down the food chain will wither.
  18. Ridiculous that could never happen!!
  19. Do you really believe that had the Man U penalty decision been at the other end a penalty would have been awarded to us.
  20. That cannot be described as "safe standing".
  21. My understanding is that SW claimed that 5% of supporters would use safe standing if it was available not that they would like safe standing to be installed. I for one am not particularly surprised by that figure as most people these days prefer to watch any form of entertainment in comfort. You still haven't clarified what you mean by safe standing without the seats. Can tou give an example of where this is currently used?
  • Create New...