Robo61

Not sure what you mean by a fairer chance. ST holders will, and rightly so, always have first dibs, anything else would be unfair on those who committ to going to 19+ games a season.

Why would everyone need to start on zero? The club have data from the last 10 years so can easily restart any rolling period using that data.

That is certainly not the impression they gave, though they certainly had an outline of what any future scheme would look like. Lets be honest whatever they do, a good number of fans will not like it because in their eyes the club cannot do anything right at the moment.

At last weeks meeting, Jim said any future checks would be on a percentage of fan. It was also though suggested that all fans travelling on the clubs transport could have their tickets issued on the coach.

I didn't hear that bit, but while I agree it's a concern, Jim must have support from the board in carrying out this work So I would be very surprised if some changes arent made for next season.

I attended via Teams last weeks your 90 minutes discussion on the ticket priority scheme. A few takes from the discussion below There were 23 foxes fans ejected/arrested at Goodison most of whom were not entitled to purchase a ticket under the current scheme As a result the club will be re-introducing identity checks at away games possibly before the end of the season The scheme will likely see big changes next season i.e severe reduction in qualifying period from the current 10 years possibly as low as 2 seasons: no more 50pts for ST holders, replaced with 1pt per match attended: ability for fans to sell ticket back to the club if they are no longer able to attend: changes or abolition of the members ballot. While the impression given was that the club are well aware that changes need to be made, they only had a very broad outline of what those changes may look like. All attendees were able to express there view and I think all of us were heartened that at last there appeared to be commitment to make the changes neccesary. Only time will tell though I guess.

Abuse isn’t though confined to national politics, most MPs are pretty well known in their constituency.

Can we have a "not bothered" Doubt if anyone is actively a "no one out", but I am sure for alot of us whether anyone goes or not we don't think it is likely to greatly effect the long term trojectory of the club one way or the other.

This unprodictability is exactly why we should be putting all our effort and resources in avoiding climate change altogether, rather than trying to predict how we need to mitigate its consequences.

I don't think so https://www.cityam.com/sadiq-khans-office-apologises-after-failing-to-probe-concerns-tied-to-ex-deputy-mayor/ https://www.bigissue.com/news/housing/sadiq-khan-london-homeless-children-christmas/ https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-68905791

I like most on here have no problem with the issues being discussed, but also feel that language used is completely over the top. Even such terms as "held to account" make it sound like you believe that club officials have deliberately got us to this place. I simpy do not understand the personal anger directed at staff who were pivotal in us winning the league.

Funny how we expect first generation immigrants to integrate, yet don't consider their offspring to be citizens here in the UK. We really are a nation of hypocrites

I don't see how it's even possible to serve consecutive life sentences.

Why do we need seperate home and away loyalty schemes, should be one if you ask me. Beyond that: 1 point per match attended, regardless of supporter status Rolling three year period Bonus points for least popular games home or away

He was found guilty of manslaughter actually and ordered to be detained in a secure hospital (e.g Broadmoor) indefinately, likely the rest of his life. Daily Mail level of spin there mate, but probably the sort of thing Trump was referring to.

These are promoted as the best ofboth worlds, but seem just the opposite to me. Lugging around two different technologies, just mean double or more things to go wrong.

Nuclear will most certainly be in the mix, but there are other ways of ensuring we have baseload when their is no wind or sun you know.

On that I can agree, even if that was economically & politically possible, which it isn't, the article doesnt address where we would find the manpower to build that vast infrastructure in such a short time span. Very disappointing this sort of rubbish does no favours to anyone.

Not sure anyone has suggested net zero would be met by 2030, the goal of this and the last givernment is 2050.

The effect will almost certainly be within a hundred years I agree, but populations will be too busy dealing with the aftermath to really care about who is responsible until sometime later.

Not sure there will be anyone left who can be fully held to be accountable, as it will take a long to play out. It seems to me that the worst that will happen to these charlatans is that at some point a hundred years or so away, there will be a debate about whether their statues should remain in place so that future generations can learn the lessons of history. But they won't as is being played out now, humans struggle to learn the lessons of even relatively recent histical events.

I am sure you are right, but do you think he cares one bit?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Hydrogen fual cells to power electric motors, yes NamX cars have electric motors, were invented nearly 200 years agoso hydrogen is certainly not following the progress of battery technology. Namx have also not addressed the costs of producing hydrogen nor is there a solution on the horizon unlike battery technology which is moving foward on a daily basis. I note you fail to address the need urgency on this matter, are you sure you don't have any financial interest in the petrochemical industry. Anyway I've more than had my say and don't see this thread moving forward to I'm out

Sorry it was you who was saying wait for Hydrogen all I've done is to show the challenges to that to which your only response is I think or technology always moves on. I'd be delighted if scientists discovered a way to make, transport and store hydrogen cheaply and practically as it would offer another power source for transport, business and the home, but humans simply cannot wait for that to happen. Like fusion hydrogen is always 30 years away.