One will guarantee the future of civilisation going forward, one will not.
Not sure about the figures for each, but given what the human cost is, perhaps that might be less important?
Come on now...
You seem to know that fossil fuels are subsidised but don't know the figures for renewables, I find that odd.
Renewables keep being touted as the cheaper alternative, but at the same time requiring double the fossil fuel subsidies. If you ask struggling families which they would prefer, you can guess the answer.
Fossil fuels will be needed until viable alternatives are readily available.i.e renewables and nuclear.