HankMarvin

Apart from taking his advice not to appear in America £££

STEVE COOPER has indicated he WOULD accept the Leicester job - if offered the role. https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/28271253/steve-cooper-leicester-burnley-kompany/

How many wank signings with money lost though, nearly 70m in one season on Daka, Soumare, and Vestagard. nearly 100m Youri, Perez, praet. 50m Soyuncu, Benkovic, Ward.

1.5 at the most

Now Tavolieri is back with a new story, this time to claim that the conversation between Leicester City and Dwomoh’s representatives did happen. It’s said club and agents met on Monday to start talks about the transfer and discuss personal terms. His side Royal Antwerp are thought to be demanding €3m for the move.

Oscar Garcia 3rd favourite on sky bet

The Commission accepted that Everton was entitled to credit for the following matters (a) the club had already been penalised in the FY22 proceedings for two of the three years at issue (b) the loss of sponsorship revenues from USM Services Limited and (c) Everton admitted the breach at the first opportunity The Commission agreed that point (a) justifies a reduction of Everton’s penalty by two points and that (b) and (c) combined justified a further reduction of one point.

4th Favourite now

If KM is right and our PSR losses for 3 seasons are just £25m, then why keep the Barnes transfer until 23/24? Surely the club would’ve been doing all it could to avoid a breach, potential sanctions, points deduction's etc The punishments appear to be cumulative, so it would appear to be better to avoid a seasonal breach rather than soften the deficit of the following season and face two?

Forest permitted losses was 61m over a 3 year Cycle not sure how that is even comparable. “Forest's losses to 2022-23 breached the threshold of £61m by £34.5m” 25m less than Forest wouldn’t even be a breach. “The Premier League charged Leicester in March over an alleged breach of the league's PSR and the EFL has subsequently placed the club under a transfer embargo” We haven’t breached PSR for this season just gone because the accounts are not released until March/April. What exactly make you think we wouldn’t breach psr at £83m after 2 seasons of 170m losses Then a 3rd season with less income, prize money etc less players sales than previous years and those seasons mentioned resulted in losses of 90m? Even if by some sort of miracle we made no losses for the championship year and sold 10 players we would’ve still had 170m losses over 3 seasons Minus the exemptions for PSR Calculations mentioned previously. I mentioned the business plan not being submitted because the resulting sanctions for breaches are less severe for clubs that are working towards reducing losses. It can and will be argued that by delaying the submitting of the business plan and spending £50m on new players despite know the financial predicament the club was in will be viewed as bending/exploiting the rules. Here is more info taken from a sky article “They give pretty clear indicators of why the Premier League has charged Leicester, although it's very important to point out that these two successive losses of £92.5m and £89.7m are not the specific PSR loss figures - which, remember, allows for a maximum of £105m of losses over any three-year period. Nevertheless, these accounts give a very clear indication of the fact that Leicester have lost huge amounts of money in the past two years, hence the PSR charge. Leicester and the Premier League are keeping those PSR numbers closely guarded, as they are at the core of their legal dispute These elements, which are part of the £89.7m losses, are not included in the PSR calculations. For example, depreciation, expenditure on women's football, community development expenditure, academy expenditure are not included. Leicester have recorded these huge losses, despite £74.8m of profit in terms of player sales in this latest accounting period, which includes the sale of Wesley Fofana to Chelsea and James Maddison to Tottenham”

If you were his agent why would you agree to be paid lower than the last 3 Chelsea managers and the same as Sean Dyche?

People get less time for involuntary manslaughter

145m to Chelsea

No Ipswich and Southampton are not currently facing points deductions, is the answer so it’s not really comparable with McKennas situation and as you suggested he was much coveted and is staying where he is, that might be also down to the fact he was reportedly told he wasn’t selected for the job.

Do they face point deductions? spending limited?

Only if we delay adding replacement staff and wages to the next financial year

Given the current state of the club, and the offer on the table he would’ve been mad not to

The club made losses of 215m over a 3 year period. 33.1m 20/21 92.5 21/22 89.7m 22/23 (Costs associated with infrastructure investment, youth and women's teams can be deducted when calculating PSR losses) is that going to be 110m? permitted losses 3 year cycle 105m plus the Covid year so not sure how the ground lies with the first breach. Last 23/24 season, permitted losses £83m 3 years what we do know is the previous 2 seasons losses £182.2m losses (Again minus costs Costs associated with infrastructure investment, youth and women's teams can be deducted when calculating PSR losses) Thats before you factor in this seasons losses, plus the delaying of submitting finance plan and spending prior to the season starting.

Look at the losses In the 2021-2022 season, Everton breached the PSR by accruing losses of £124.5 million. As there was a breach of the £105 million maximum (rule E.51), the Premier League were obligated to refer the breach to a Premier League Commission (‘the Commission’). They are awaiting the outcome of a second charge for the period including the 2022-23 season. The Premier League said Forest admitted breaching PSR by £34.5m above their permitted threshold of £61m

2, yes

It’s not the same Ajax though, they hasn’t finished lower than 3rd in 20 years 2 seasons now without Champions league revenue

And the next in terms of the balancing act that follows

Carlos backed to fav on Skybet

Do you think he will only be paid 5m?

Bring back Ward then