MONreborn Posted 7 July 2015 Share Posted 7 July 2015 Hello, I am new to this board, but having trouble posting topics. I want to create a topic 1 week post pearsons sacking, to see if fans believe he should be re-instated however the topic keeps getting deleted. Ive pasted the topic below, I wondered if you could please help this being listed. It seems to be ok for a minute or so, have about 10 votes (of yes) and then disappear. This is a poll, and hopefully if we get enough yes votes, the begining of a campaign to get Nigel back at the club. We are now 7 days down the line, most people have probably had a chance to calm themselves and make a rational decision. So, here is the question.If, in a hypoethetical situation, pearson tried to make peace with the owners, and vice versa, would you want him to become Leicester city manager again? Just a simple yes or no. For the Yes vote:Best winning percentage in clubs history, in both spells as manager. In full seasons: 2 league titles, 2 play off campaigns, 1 premier league survivalIncredible signings, without breaking the bankNever blaming his players, and creating the best team ethic in the premier league. You can now say foxes never quit, and really believe it. Always adapting and improving as a managerFor the no vote:Poor media management, although, I feel some of this was a deliberate ploy last season - to take pressure of the players. Sometimes slow to adapt and change formation and personnel, although, he always got it right in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark_w Posted 7 July 2015 Share Posted 7 July 2015 I imagine it's being deleted because of the thread title and the fact that there are numerous very similar threads. Surely you can see that 'Nigel Pearson returning to LCFC' or whatever it was is a bit of an irritating thread title when it's turns out it's just some hypothetical poll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 7 July 2015 Share Posted 7 July 2015 Because there's already a thread asking if he should have been sacked most likely... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPH Posted 7 July 2015 Share Posted 7 July 2015 You say you are new to the board but it says you joined in 2005... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
possiblygeorge Posted 8 July 2015 Share Posted 8 July 2015 You say you are new to the board but it says you joined in 2005... Only two explanations for this reason: 1) He's a time traveller. or 2) We live in a paradox and it's still 2005. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampson Posted 8 July 2015 Share Posted 8 July 2015 Probably because it's even more unabashed clickbait than this thread is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.