SilverFox Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Driving home from work I just heard on radio Leicester that Micky Adams is hoping to bring in someone (on loan) as cover for Walker/Pressman. Who do we want? And no you can't say logan
Mark Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Nice another waste of money Adams. What is the POINT. He refuses to name a sub keeper anyway. Logan is a good enough 3rd choice backup. Things like this make me angry.
Oli Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 I realistic target possibly Stuart Taylor (keep dreaming TB)
Scow Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Casey Keller?!?!?! :: 18707[/snapback] Or even Kasey Keller.
SilverFox Posted 13 September 2004 Author Posted 13 September 2004 Casey Keller?!?!?! :: 18707[/snapback] Or even Kasey Keller. 18708[/snapback] Why I oughta....
gagandeep Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 USA...USA...USA!!!! bring back kasey!!!!!! 18712[/snapback] he's out of contract at the end of the season. I think Walker will be off, how old is he about 33? if we go up i think we might go for him on a 2 year contract. <_<
davieG Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Nice another waste of money Adams. What is the POINT. He refuses to name a sub keeper anyway. Logan is a good enough 3rd choice backup.Things like this make me angry. 18705[/snapback] Have to say I agree with that
Alexikokopops Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Alan Marriott!! Lincoln City goalie, LEGEND!!
gagandeep Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Theo Zagorakis?? 18765[/snapback] , was that palace away? He conceded a couple of goals that mad eit go to a replay i think.
Buzzell Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 I will be happy depending on who it will be. If its somebody really crap then I think it is a waste of money!
gagandeep Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 i think we can get macho or ambrosio from chelsea on loan, paying next to none of the wages.
Ash Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 I think it will be a low key player from lower divison .....Just a backup player
City Fan Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Neither of those play for Chelsea anymore.....
Eastern Fox Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 We don't need anyone on loan. Why pay Pressman's and Logan's salaries if we don't use them, there perfectly adequate cover. Anyway, why is that MA takes the risk of not have a goalkeeper on the bench in games like brighton, wolves, rotherham and then when one goalkeeper's injured he thinks he needs backup? Would he actually put a cover goalkeeper on the bench if he doesn't put a backup gk in the squad normally ? He didn't put Logan on the bench against Rotherham.
Anish Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 We don't need anyone on loan. Why pay Pressman's and Logan's salaries if we don't use them, there perfectly adequate cover. Anyway, why is that MA takes the risk of not have a goalkeeper on the bench in games like brighton, wolves, rotherham and then when one goalkeeper's injured he thinks he needs backup? Would he actually put a cover goalkeeper on the bench if he doesn't put a backup gk in the squad normally ? He didn't put Logan on the bench against Rotherham. 18827[/snapback] Well said. My sentiments exactly. Some of MA's decisions are simply moronic.
Macca4lcfc Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 We don't need anyone on loan. Why pay Pressman's and Logan's salaries if we don't use them, there perfectly adequate cover. Anyway, why is that MA takes the risk of not have a goalkeeper on the bench in games like brighton, wolves, rotherham and then when one goalkeeper's injured he thinks he needs backup? Would he actually put a cover goalkeeper on the bench if he doesn't put a backup gk in the squad normally ? He didn't put Logan on the bench against Rotherham. 18827[/snapback] Well said. My sentiments exactly. Some of MA's decisions are simply moronic. 18873[/snapback] Logan is hopeful of making the bench on tuesday
Scow Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 We don't need anyone on loan. Why pay Pressman's and Logan's salaries if we don't use them, there perfectly adequate cover. Anyway, why is that MA takes the risk of not have a goalkeeper on the bench in games like brighton, wolves, rotherham and then when one goalkeeper's injured he thinks he needs backup? Would he actually put a cover goalkeeper on the bench if he doesn't put a backup gk in the squad normally ? He didn't put Logan on the bench against Rotherham. 18827[/snapback] Well said. My sentiments exactly. Some of MA's decisions are simply moronic. 18873[/snapback] Logan is hopeful of making the bench on tuesday 18881[/snapback] He's going to be disappointed then because Micky don't like putting keepers on the bench. There is a first time for everything though....
Eastern Fox Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 We don't need anyone on loan. Why pay Pressman's and Logan's salaries if we don't use them, there perfectly adequate cover. Anyway, why is that MA takes the risk of not have a goalkeeper on the bench in games like brighton, wolves, rotherham and then when one goalkeeper's injured he thinks he needs backup? Would he actually put a cover goalkeeper on the bench if he doesn't put a backup gk in the squad normally ? He didn't put Logan on the bench against Rotherham. 18827[/snapback] Well said. My sentiments exactly. Some of MA's decisions are simply moronic. 18873[/snapback] Logan is hopeful of making the bench on tuesday 18881[/snapback] He's going to be disappointed then because Micky don't like putting keepers on the bench. There is a first time for everything though.... 18903[/snapback] I would hate to think what might have happened if he didn't have a keeper on the bench against Birmingham at home last year....
gagandeep Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 We don't need anyone on loan. Why pay Pressman's and Logan's salaries if we don't use them, there perfectly adequate cover. Anyway, why is that MA takes the risk of not have a goalkeeper on the bench in games like brighton, wolves, rotherham and then when one goalkeeper's injured he thinks he needs backup? Would he actually put a cover goalkeeper on the bench if he doesn't put a backup gk in the squad normally ? He didn't put Logan on the bench against Rotherham. 18827[/snapback] Well said. My sentiments exactly. Some of MA's decisions are simply moronic. 18873[/snapback] Logan is hopeful of making the bench on tuesday 18881[/snapback] He's going to be disappointed then because Micky don't like putting keepers on the bench. There is a first time for everything though.... 18903[/snapback] I would hate to think what might have happened if he didn't have a keeper on the bench against Birmingham at home last year.... 18992[/snapback] And united. (manu)
Joe_Fox Posted 15 September 2004 Posted 15 September 2004 Remember when Zagorakis went in goal? That was a classic moment. 3-3 against Palace away.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.