Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Micky Singh

formation and first 11

Recommended Posts

Posted

i'd go for 3 5 2, because we haven't got a right back or left back so whats the point. might as well make the midfield stronger, and stearman is better in a centre back position. Only problem who gonna partner hume. i would chose dublin or de vries, due to their height. & with out and out wingers playing we would get in more crosses.

Henderson

Stearman Marcarthy Gerrbrand

Smith Hughes Williams Joey Hamil

Hume Dublin/De Vires

What u lot think??????

:thumbup:

Posted

i'd go for 3 5 2, because we haven't got a right back or left back so whats the point. might as well make the midfield stronger, and stearman is better in a centre back position. Only problem who gonna partner hume. i would chose dublin or de vries, due to their height. & with out and out wingers playing we would get in more crosses.

Henderson

Stearman Marcarthy Gerrbrand Maybury

Smith Hughes Williams Joey Hamil

Hume Dublin/De Vires

What u lot think??????

:thumbup:

Henderson

stearman marcarthy gerrbrand

Hughes williams smith

Hume Dublin Hammond

Posted

i'd go for 3 5 2, because we haven't got a right back or left back so whats the point. might as well make the midfield stronger, and stearman is better in a centre back position. Only problem who gonna partner hume. i would chose dublin or de vries, due to their height. & with out and out wingers playing we would get in more crosses.

Henderson

Stearman Marcarthy Gerrbrand

Smith Hughes Williams Joey Hamil

Hume Dublin/De Vires

What u lot think??????

:thumbup:

Sheehan and Maybury pop to mind.

I would play a 3-2-3-2 my team would be -

Hendo

Maybury

McCarthy (all as centre backs)

Gerrbrand

Joey

Stearman (both to protect the back 3)

Hughes

Willams (creativity)

Smith

Hammond

Hume

Also with this you can easily revert to a 4-4-2

Posted

Henderson

stearman marcarthy gerrbrand

Hughes williams smith

Hume Dublin Hammond

Only playing with 10??

No wonder we're where we are

Posted

i think the biggest problem has been the balance of the team. we need to start scoring, so turning to the formation 3 5 2 gives us more attacking nature. we might actually score some goals. 4 4 2 just ain't working with the players we got.

Posted

It's funny how everyone has put Henderson as first choice keeper. I wonder why he is not given more of a chance?

I have nothing against Douglas, he sounded like he played well on Saturday. If he remains first choice I hope he continues this form.

Posted

We have a damn great left back in Peter Gilbert, that moron just loaned him out, is the problem! :(

Did I miss something?

And he's been transfered to Wednesday the other day

Posted

We have a damn great left back in Peter Gilbert, that moron just loaned him out, is the problem! :(

He's not on loan anymore, he was sold to Sheff Weds for an undisclosed amount, whatever, he never showed any kind of potential while he was with us so you can kind of understand why he was sold on. It's a pity really, the LB position is one we've been having trouble with all season...

Posted

Personally, I'd stick with 4-4-2 for the simple reason that the best performances I've seen this season have been while playing that formation...

Douglas/Henderson

Stearman - McCarthy - Gerrbrand - Sheehan

Unknown - Joey - Hughes/Williams - Smith

Unknown - Hume

The two unknown's are the right sided midfield player and the striker that CL is bringing in in January, apparantly.

Posted

3-5-2 or 3-4-3

------------Henderson-------------

Stearman--McCarthy--Gerrbrand

Smith--Willams--Joey--Hamill

----------Hume----------

Hammond----MDV

with 3-4-3 you can move Hume up to the left of MDV or Dublin

:unsure:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...