Long term/Short term

[Teeno]

Just wondering what everyone's opinion is on this?

If Levein was to go tommorow who would tou want in?

A long term fix, someone who would come in onca long contract and possibly have a long future with the club?

Or do you settle for someone with the experience and motivation skills to keep them up on a short term contract?

[Libertine]

Short term just to keep us up. If they seem good enough to keep on, then sign them for longer.

[Head Honcho]

Keegan till the end of the season, maybe then we'll see the type of all out attacking football that we need to play to have any chance of survival!

[Milky]

i really do think we can forget about getting a new manager. i just cannot see levein getting the sack, even if we loose the next 2 or 3, i still think this board have decided to stick with levein for the long term

[Ajax Treesdown]

It will be someone till the end of the season. a permanent replacement at the end of the season.

[john_lcfc]

short term contracts only please so if things go pear shaped we dont have to pay off the manager a large fee <_<

[Bert]

Short term, with a view to long term a bit like Hoddle at Wolves last season.

[winnie the blue]

I'd take short term now so we can take stock and see where we need to build from in the Summer. Having said that if we still go down then chances of pulling in ad ecent bloke then are less.

[Tommeh]

Defenatly short term we simply have to stay up and thats all that mattters

[Leicester Rule!]

Short Term to help us stay up this year, then depending on how he he does either offer a new contract to him (if it's a he!!! ) or get a new manager in on a long term basis.

[lesta fox]

I think that short term will do as all we need to do is to make sure that we stay up because if we go down we will be in serious trouble, as we will lose a lot of our better players