City Fan Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 How come its Tim Davies (the chief exec) doing the sackings, the official statements, the announcements etc? Most other football club chairmans do that sort of job. And I don't think I even know who the chairman is because we hear nothing of him. Is it McCahill?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajax Treesdown Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 Apart from one photo once I saw once, I think he is dead tho! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 How come its Tim Davies (the chief exec) doing the sackings, the official statements, the announcements etc?Most other football club chairmans do that sort of job. And I don't think I even know who the chairman is because we hear nothing of him. Is it McCahill?? Because he's the Chief Executive and that's his job, it's also the job he gets paid for (£200,000/year I believe), all the other Directors bar the one employed to replace Mace are not paid a penny. Surely for that sort of money we can ask him to do a bit of hiring and firing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 Because he's the Chief Executive and that's his job, it's also the job he gets paid for (£200,000/year I believe), all the other Directors bar the one employed to replace Mace are not paid a penny. Surely for that sort of money we can ask him to do a bit of hiring and firing. We might ask him to get us a good manager for a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City Fan Posted 29 January 2006 Author Share Posted 29 January 2006 Because he's the Chief Executive and that's his job, it's also the job he gets paid for (£200,000/year I believe), all the other Directors bar the one employed to replace Mace are not paid a penny. Surely for that sort of money we can ask him to do a bit of hiring and firing. Surely its the Chairman's job though? Not the Chief Exec? I can't think of any other clubs that has the Chief Exec pretty much running the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 Surely its the Chairman's job though? Not the Chief Exec? I can't think of any other clubs that has the Chief Exec pretty much running the club. Chelsea. - Kenyon? It's not the title that's important it's how the club is set up. The board of Directors with the Chairman have appointed a Chief Executive to run the Club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muz Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 Surely its the Chairman's job though? Not the Chief Exec? I can't think of any other clubs that has the Chief Exec pretty much running the club. Linda Block at Harchester Utd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox123 Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 Linda Block at Harchester Utd She can stay their don't like the look of their new manager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gené and Tonic Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 I don't really care aslong as Davies makes the right decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City Fan Posted 29 January 2006 Author Share Posted 29 January 2006 Chelsea. - Kenyon? It's not the title that's important it's how the club is set up. The board of Directors with the Chairman have appointed a Chief Executive to run the Club. It would be Abramovich the Chairman who would sack Mourinho, not Kenyon. Freddy Shephard at Newcastle...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bolt Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 nothing much he gives us no money and no support and i never hear from him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairman of the Bored Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 Can't we have a Chairman who cooks nice meals though? Delia is a honey and her food is scrumptious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 It would be Abramovich the Chairman who would sack Mourinho, not Kenyon. Freddy Shephard at Newcastle...... Kenyon would do the deed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City Fan Posted 29 January 2006 Author Share Posted 29 January 2006 Kenyon would do the deed. It would be Roman's decision though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 It would be Roman's decision though. At Leicester it was the Boards decision but Tim had to do the actual deed, as Isaid he is paid to carry out the boards decision. Of course in both case they will listen to the adive of the CE and others before making that decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 Some people have no idea how business works.... Why have a dog and bark yourself? Besides, the chairman was at Home Park last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City Fan Posted 29 January 2006 Author Share Posted 29 January 2006 My main point was that the Chairman does bugger all, you don't hear from him, you don't know about him, I bet less than half of City fans know his name, does he even attend the games? Shouldn't he even be involved in choosing the next gaffer, because from where Im standing it seems like Tim Davies is doing the deciding. Doesn't the chairman care about his club? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 Why have a dog and bark yourself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxes_Trust Posted 29 January 2006 Share Posted 29 January 2006 My main point was that the Chairman does bugger all, you don't hear from him, you don't know about him, I bet less than half of City fans know his name, does he even attend the games? Shouldn't he even be involved in choosing the next gaffer, because from where Im standing it seems like Tim Davies is doing the deciding. Doesn't the chairman care about his club? Jim MaCahill the chairman attends the vast majority of games home & away, as he has done for many years prior to being involved in the Consortium. 'Been a fan for years' is often claimed by those running a club, but we can 100% confirm Jim was as he sat right behind one of our current Foxes Trust board members for a number of years. A selection panel is put together who interview potential managers, both the Chairman & Chief Exec take part as well as other Directors. The selection panel then make their recommendation & the chosen candidate(s) then appear in front of the entire board before the decision is final. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest seanfox778 Posted 30 January 2006 Share Posted 30 January 2006 the chairman sat about 3 rows behind me at the plymouth game but he just sat there while tim davies went round and talked to all the fans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon the Hat Posted 30 January 2006 Share Posted 30 January 2006 the chairman sat about 3 rows behind me at the plymouth game but he just sat there while tim davies went round and talked to all the fans Well, if half the fans don't know who he is or what he looks like then it was better for Tim to do the talking wasn't it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil_LCFC Posted 30 January 2006 Share Posted 30 January 2006 Apparantly our chairman plays the organ in a church in Corby at 10.30 every day if you need to get hold of him ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.