lookwhaticando Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 Who has ever suggested playing Sylla and Hamill?. I've been wanting them back in Scotland for months - in fact I don't remember anyone campaigning for those two. Scotland? My dear fellow, that's not bloody far enough away! Besides, the quality in Scotland is much higher than the likes of Hamill can achieve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 It's alright hypothesising who should and shouldn't be playing, and which system should or shouldn't be employed, but RK has 1) limited resources and 2) to try to stop us from playing outside the top 2 divisions for the first time in the club's history. If he gets 2) with 1) then great. What more do people expect? How many weeks has he had? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwell Pablo Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 Who has ever suggested playing Sylla and Hamill?. I've been wanting them back in Scotland for months - in fact I don't remember anyone campaigning for those two. Mr Levein. Unfortuantely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwell Pablo Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 It's alright hypothesising who should and shouldn't be playing, and which system should or shouldn't be employed, but RK has 1) limited resources and 2) to try to stop us from playing outside the top 2 divisions for the first time in the club's history. If he gets 2) with 1) then great. What more do people expect? How many weeks has he had? even if we lost every game left this season I dont think Milwall Brighton or Crewe would catch us now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 even if we lost every game left this season I dont think Milwall Brighton or Crewe would catch us now. I don't think managers think like that, and I'm glad they don't. I'd rather see the team fighting until it's mathematically safe, rather than see us play out the rest of the season with mediocre performances. Also, we could still have a bearing on who is promoted, and who gets into the play-offs. The longer we remain competitive in spirit, the better for next season, when we will hopefully have the bulk of this squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwell Pablo Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 I don't think managers think like that, and I'm glad they don't. I'd rather see the team fighting until it's mathematically safe, rather than see us play out the rest of the season with mediocre performances. Also, we could still have a bearing on who is promoted, and who gets into the play-offs. The longer we remain competitive in spirit, the better for next season, when we will hopefully have the bulk of this squad. Totally agreed. My point is I wouldnt lose any sleep about us going down if I were you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 My point is I wouldnt lose any sleep about us going down if I were you. Ah, get you! I'm not, but I won't celebrate until we are definitely safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Fox Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 We're Staying up ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katy Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 Ah, get you! I'm not, but I won't celebrate until we are definitely safe. And you are very wise not to Lisa, many a club have thought they were safe only to get dragged back in at the last minute. Its good to be cautious, especially supporting Leicester but what a bastard of a party we're going to have WHEN we are safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 And you are very wise not to Lisa, many a club have thought they were safe only to get dragged back in at the last minute. Its good to be cautious, especially supporting Leicester but what a bastard of a party we're going to have WHEN we are safe :laugh: :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 It's alright hypothesising who should and shouldn't be playing, and which system should or shouldn't be employed, but RK has 1) limited resources and 2) to try to stop us from playing outside the top 2 divisions for the first time in the club's history. If he gets 2) with 1) then great. What more do people expect? How many weeks has he had? He's managed (2) with (1) already in my estimation and the sooner he gets on to (3) signing an extended deal and (4) developing his team, the better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 22 March 2006 Share Posted 22 March 2006 He's managed (2) with (1) already in my estimation and the sooner he gets on to (3) signing an extended deal and (4) developing his team, the better. I think (3) is in the boards hands. They clearly believe that since he's already got a mandate until the end of the season, there's no reason to try to tie him down any longer just yet - they've got some time to think up a package and offer it upon successful completition of his present duties. Come April 30/May 1, if the board want to keep him they will offer him a contract. The transfer window doesn't open for a little while after the last game has been played in our league, so he'll have a little time to rest, then to plan his actions and get the ball rolling when the transfer window opens (that's (4) in your terms) It's in the boards court now. They might be tempted to do a Man City/Stuart Pearce job and give him a longer term deal with a few games to go. We'll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.6fd28aa106e880ff4a96d805dc9c9257.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.