James Chandler-Walker Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Bit of a sweeping genrelisation Chandler. Think you'll find no one backed him in the end, When exactly are you going to get that chip off ur shoulder? Third question, what are you doing out of bed so early I thought u were Nocturnal? Micky decided he didnt want you last night or somthing? Tell me my semi literate fookwit mate when exactly did the 'end' actually come for you? Was it after our record breaking sixth defeat on the spin or was it the morning after the most overdue announcment in footie history? And tell me, why is it that scumbags like you still bleat on about Levein's team building and his latterday signings as if they and not Kelly are the real reason behind our miraculous transformation? And why is it that twats like you can save up your putrid bile for someone who left LCFC in the last ice age but fall strangely mute about someone who left five minutes ago with the most shocking record in the club's history? Obviously had yer brains shagged out by a certain sausage jock...
Suffolk_fox Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Now JCW, this is a friendly site. We can all disagree with each other but abuse is not welcome. Be a good gentleman and cut it out please.
Finnegan Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 if we sakd him @ crimbo we wuldn hav fryatt ... Sorry. I just wanted to be on the bandwagon.
Katy Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Now JCW, this is a friendly site. We can all disagree with each other but abuse is not welcome. Be a good gentleman and cut it out please. I feel he will be Disillusioned by that comment SF
Manwell Pablo Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Tell me my semi literate fookwit mate when exactly did the 'end' actually come for you? Was it after our record breaking sixth defeat on the spin or was it the morning after the most overdue announcment in footie history? And tell me, why is it that scumbags like you still bleat on about Levein's team building and his latterday signings as if they and not Kelly are the real reason behind our miraculous transformation? And why is it that twats like you can save up your putrid bile for someone who left LCFC in the last ice age but fall strangely mute about someone who left five minutes ago with the most shocking record in the club's history? Obviously had yer brains shagged out by a certain sausage jock... Think I hit a nerve. Maybe two.
James Chandler-Walker Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Now JCW, this is a friendly site. We can all disagree with each other but abuse is not welcome. Be a good gentleman and cut it out please. Don't preach at me vicar. There are several on this board who engage in abusive correspondence without any censure from bigotted moralising geeks like you. If you want to attempt a Mary Whitehouse style clean-up campaign here you can start with the Latrino's and the fickle boneheads whose views you so obviously share. Don't pretend that it is my profanity that offends you - it's the fact that I've exposed your mates as complete tossers.
Manwell Pablo Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Tell me my semi literate fookwit mate when exactly did the 'end' actually come for you? Was it after our record breaking sixth defeat on the spin or was it the morning after the most overdue announcment in footie history? And tell me, why is it that scumbags like you still bleat on about Levein's team building and his latterday signings as if they and not Kelly are the real reason behind our miraculous transformation? And why is it that twats like you can save up your putrid bile for someone who left LCFC in the last ice age but fall strangely mute about someone who left five minutes ago with the most shocking record in the club's history? Obviously had yer brains shagged out by a certain sausage jock... Smelling Mitake Their Chindler. Because your boyfriend left him with a squad thats was absloutley rubbish, and he's replaced them with half decent young players who can take this club fowards. He couldnt motivate them so the club sacked him, and he got sacked probabley two games late at most. I could see what he was trying to do, he didnt have the man mangement skills to do it, thanks for the players see ya later Craig, simple. I Don't know who you keep going on about it! Why is it Twats like you can only talk about Craig Levein and nothing else that goes on at this club.
Manwell Pablo Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Don't preach at me vicar. There are several on this board who engage in abusive correspondence without any censure from bigotted moralising geeks like you. If you want to attempt a Mary Whitehouse style clean-up campaign here you can start with the Latrino's and the fickle boneheads whose views you so obviously share. Don't pretend that it is my profanity that offends you - it's the fact that I've exposed your mates as complete tossers. Is this what happens if you force a dictionairy down a nine year olds throat, followed by some coke up its nose? close this thread ffs. People should know better then to try get a sensible conversation about CL going with him around.
James Chandler-Walker Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Smelling Mitake Their Chindler. Because your boyfriend left him with a squad thats was absloutley rubbish, and he's replaced them with half decent young players who can take this club fowards. He couldnt motivate them so the club sacked him, and he got sacked probabley two games late at most. I could see what he was trying to do, he didnt have the man mangement skills to do it, thanks for the players see ya later Craig, simple. I Don't know who you keep going on about it! Why is it Twats like you can only talk about Craig Levein and nothing else that goes on at this club. Come back when they've found a cure for dyslexia...
LCFC UK Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Would we now be in with a chance of a play-off place? I think we would I think we would have, but at the cost of Fryatt? Id rather wait till next season then go up.
LCFC UK Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Somebody ban this fool. Why? For stating his opinon
Finnegan Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 When you can't counter somebody's obviously readable argument without picking at their spelling, you know you're an idiot.
Manwell Pablo Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Somebody ban this fool. You can't ban someone for having a dig at my spelling, although the fact there wasn't a single spelling mistake in that post might make is a banable offense.
Katy Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 You can't ban someone for having a dig at my spelling, although the fact there wasn't a single spelling mistake in that post might make is a banable offense. I believe the abuse of a fellow member is a banning offence though.
Suffolk_fox Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Don't preach at me vicar. There are several on this board who engage in abusive correspondence without any censure from bigotted moralising geeks like you. If you want to attempt a Mary Whitehouse style clean-up campaign here you can start with the Latrino's and the fickle boneheads whose views you so obviously share. Don't pretend that it is my profanity that offends you - it's the fact that I've exposed your mates as complete tossers. OK, I tried to be reasonable. Your type are not welcome on here - If I wanted to read through profanities written by people who are barely literate then there are plenty of websites out there that offer this. I suggest you either learn to be civil and to argue your case without resorting to abuse or start looking for another site.
Anish Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 Why? For stating his opinon You can't ban someone for having a dig at my spelling, although the fact there wasn't a single spelling mistake in that post might make is a banable offense. No, not for his obssession with spelling or grammatical errors, but for regurgitating the same old shit over and over again. And also for abusing practically everyone else on this forum aside from his alter-egos Chandler and Disillusioned. He is a class A d**k, end of.
James Chandler-Walker Posted 27 March 2006 Posted 27 March 2006 You can't ban someone for having a dig at my spelling, although the fact there wasn't a single spelling mistake in that post might make is a banable offense. My, you really do have a problem. And with your logic too.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.