lookwhaticando Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 Minimal-change policy should continue. Stearman is suspended for his fifth yellow, if I'm not mistaken. Other than that there shouldn't be any enforced changes. So the team will be as follows, assuming there's no injuries between now and Saturday. -----------------Henderson Maybury-- McAuley-- Kisnorbo --Johansson --Hughes ----Williams ----Tiatto ----Porter ------------Hammond------ Hume Subs: Logan, McCarthy, Low, Fryatt, Wesolowski Almost certainly the lineup for Saturday. Probably not much need/room for discussion, but there you have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MBK Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 I believe Tiatto will eventually be replaced by a fit Weso. But yes zzz... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 19 December 2006 Author Share Posted 19 December 2006 I believe Tiatto will eventually be replaced by a fit Weso. But yes zzz... As soon as Tiatto gets injured or suspended, Wesolowski will come in and make the CM position his own. The minimal-change policy means he probably won't get in until that time. Unless we lose and RK decides to change it up a little (even then that's unlikely as he likes to show faith in his players it seems). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milky Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 is kenton not going to be fit then? if he's fit he may play at right back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MBK Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 As soon as Tiatto gets injured or suspended, Wesolowski will come in and make the CM position his own. The minimal-change policy means he probably won't get in until that time. Unless we lose and RK decides to change it up a little (even then that's unlikely as he likes to show faith in his players it seems). Which in a way allows for Weso to surprise the opposition in the second half! Hiha we re going to win win win win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lildave3 Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 I agree, never change a winning side unless it is a forced change. Maybury should come in for Stearman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scow Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 Kelly may be tempted to play Kenton right back, Maybury left back. No Kelly, no. Maybury right back, Skills left back. Ideally Weso would come in for Tiatto, but fitness may still be an issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowlattsFox Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 weso for tiatto if he his fit enough. maybury or kenton right back, dont realy mind which one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gist Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 Minimal-change policy should continue. Stearman is suspended for his fifth yellow, if I'm not mistaken. Other than that there shouldn't be any enforced changes. So the team will be as follows, assuming there's no injuries between now and Saturday. -----------------Henderson Maybury-- McAuley-- Kisnorbo --Johansson --Hughes ----Williams ----Tiatto ----Porter ------------Hammond------ Hume Subs: Logan, McCarthy, Low, Fryatt, Wesolowski Almost certainly the lineup for Saturday. Probably not much need/room for discussion, but there you have it. I agree, that's what I want to see start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 19 December 2006 Author Share Posted 19 December 2006 is kenton not going to be fit then? if he's fit he may play at right back Would prefer Maybury and I think it's the more likely option. Kelly may be tempted to play Kenton right back, Maybury left back. No Kelly, no. Maybury right back, Skills left back. Ideally Weso would come in for Tiatto, but fitness may still be an issue. Yes - he may be tempted. I don't think he will, though. Maybury for Nissa and Kenton for Stearman is two whole changes - that's two more than he'd like, one more than necessary. Unlikely. Maybury is odds-on favourite for the RB position, Kenton being the other possibility. Reason is simple. Maybury was involved more recently than Kenton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynny Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 I know Fryatt isn't playing so well right now, but NOT playing him isn't going to get him back in form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 19 December 2006 Author Share Posted 19 December 2006 I know Fryatt isn't playing so well right now, but NOT playing him isn't going to get him back in form. If he's as fat, lazy and uninterested as people say, he doesn't deserve the chance - regardless of how good (or 'bad') his replacement is. Hammond is eager, he makes things happen, he's scored two goals in two games - why begrudge him the chance to continue his run? That leaves us two options - drop Hume or go for a 3 man attack. Do we want to drop Hume for a fat, lazy Fryatt? Do we want a fat, lazy Fryatt up front at all? If he's not interested, he's no use to us. He should not play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
He's not bald Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 I know Fryatt isn't playing so well right now, but NOT playing him isn't going to get him back in form. Here here it's doing Matty's belief in himself no good but we can't afford to carry passengers against Cardiff.They may not have got the results recently but they are obviously capable and it's only a matter of time until their fortunes change...just hope it's on boxing day..fingers crossed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynny Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 If he's as fat, lazy and uninterested as people say, he doesn't deserve the chance - regardless of how good (or 'bad') his replacement is. Hammond is eager, he makes things happen, he's scored two goals in two games - why begrudge him the chance to continue his run? That leaves us two options - drop Hume or go for a 3 man attack. Do we want to drop Hume for a fat, lazy Fryatt? Do we want a fat, lazy Fryatt up front at all? If he's not interested, he's no use to us. He should not play. So he doesn't get his chance until someone's laid off with injury? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 So he doesn't get his chance until someone's laid off with injury? Well that's how it is for other players when you have a winning team e.g. McCarthy, why should Fryatt get special treatment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mort Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 Where's Sylla? I know he's crap but he's better than Low on any given day!? He's not even been on the bench for a couple of games is he injured or is RK having one of his frequent hissy fits with one of his players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 19 December 2006 Author Share Posted 19 December 2006 So he doesn't get his chance until someone's laid off with injury? No. Because if he's as uninterested as people say, he'll have been overtaken in the pecking order by then. Well that's how it is for other players when you have a winning team e.g. McCarthy, why should Fryatt get special treatment? Because he's a million-pound player. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 19 December 2006 Author Share Posted 19 December 2006 Where's Sylla? I know he's crap but he's better than Low on any given day!? He's not even been on the bench for a couple of games is he injured or is RK having one of his frequent hissy fits with one of his players? I'd stick Sylla on the bench in place of Low - but since there's no word on Sylla's situation, I'm assuming (somewhat ignorantly perhaps) that he's in fact injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scow Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 I'd stick Sylla on the bench in place of Low - but since there's no word on Sylla's situation, I'm assuming (somewhat ignorantly perhaps) that he's in fact injured. I think Sylla was beginning to return back to his lazy ways, so that might be why he's out in the cold again. Saying that, Sylla still offers us more. He can play both flanks more effectively than Low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandannieldanok Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 Minimal-change policy should continue. Stearman is suspended for his fifth yellow, if I'm not mistaken. Other than that there shouldn't be any enforced changes. So the team will be as follows, assuming there's no injuries between now and Saturday. -----------------Henderson Maybury-- McAuley-- Kisnorbo --Johansson --Hughes ----Williams ----Tiatto ----Porter ------------Hammond------ Hume Subs: Logan, McCarthy, Low, Fryatt, Wesolowski Almost certainly the lineup for Saturday. Probably not much need/room for discussion, but there you have it. I would agree with that except replace Low with Sylla. I would have dropped Stearman suspsension or no suspension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 19 December 2006 Author Share Posted 19 December 2006 I think Sylla was beginning to return back to his lazy ways, so that might be why he's out in the cold again. Saying that, Sylla still offers us more. He can play both flanks more effectively than Low. Oh really? If he's getting back to his lazy self, it's probably a good idea to put him back in the fridge. Cool him down in preparation for a glorious return in three months time. That perhaps explains why Hughes has once again found himself out on the wings - Low is effectively ineffectual () and Sylla's let the glory of actually playing football get to his head. That suits me just fine. Shame it's Low on the bench, not some bustling youngster - we could do with another one in the side after the relative success we've had with Porter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 19 December 2006 Author Share Posted 19 December 2006 I would agree with that except replace Low with Sylla. I would have dropped Stearman suspsension or no suspension. So with Stearman dropped, would you play Maybs or Kenton at RB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandannieldanok Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 So with Stearman dropped, would you play Maybs or Kenton at RB? Maybury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scow Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 Kenton has played well at right back, but he's essentially a central defender who does a job there. It perhaps wouldn't suit him if we're planning to persist with Hughes narrow right as Kenton isn't comfortable going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandannieldanok Posted 19 December 2006 Share Posted 19 December 2006 Kenton has played well at right back, but he's essentially a central defender who does a job there. It perhaps wouldn't suit him if we're planning to persist with Hughes narrow right as Kenton isn't comfortable going forward. Before the Sheffield Wednesday game at Hillsborough I would agree that Kenton played well, but his lack of pace was a huge worry. Also at times he seems lethargic. Unfortunately for him it looks like he will be contiuning in his utility man role that he hoped to drop after moving to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.