March 2007 Player of the Month

[Simi]

Hume for his effort and goals.

Horsfield easily the worst player for me this month. Constantly looked of the pace of the game and his postioning has been awful.

[Leicester Lass]

Hume best.

Maybury worst.

[lookwhaticando]

Why don't you just shorten down the list to players you think might actually deserve to be voted for?

Because it's a matter of opinion, and davieG doesn't want to impose his opinion on the rest of the forum?

Or perhaps he'd like that but doesn't think he could get away with it.

I remember a time he forgot to include Tiatto (subconsciously, naturally) and the crowd was not at all happy.

[Blue Bob]

Please use the following poll to vote for your Foxes player of the month.

We will be running these polls every month of the season and the player finishing first will get 3 points, second 2 points and third 1 point. The player with the most points at the end of the season, will then be crowned the FoxesTalk player of the season.

Qualification for players is they have had to start/played the equivalent of 3 games this month.

• This month there are 12 eligible payers from 5 games.
  
• Only 2 players started and completed all 5 games Henderson & Kisnorbo with Jarrett & Hume starting but not finishing all 5.
  
• Horsefield didn't play the equivalent of 3 games but did start 4 games
  
• Those who played but miss out are Johnson, Yeates, Cadamarteri, Hammond, Kenton, Wesolowski, Tiatto & Fryatt
  

NB-The worst player of the month is just for fun and I shan't be keeping a record of it.

Thanks for taking the time to set up this poll but if you do another one is it possible to have an option - No one deserves a vote. I agree that Hume has been the best of a bad lot but would have prefered to have voted for none of the above. Hughes is my favorite for the worst - completely clueless.

[lookwhaticando]

If you don't think anyone deserves it, don't vote.

It'll become quite clear when the poll is closed just how few people rated the players if there's not as many votes as usual.

[davieG]

Because it's a matter of opinion, and davieG doesn't want to impose his opinion on the rest of the forum?

Or perhaps he'd like that but doesn't think he could get away with it.

I remember a time he forgot to include Tiatto (subconsciously, naturally) and the crowd was not at all happy.

Thanks for taking the time to set up this poll but if you do another one is it possible to have an option - No one deserves a vote. I agree that Hume has been the best of a bad lot but would have prefered to have voted for none of the above. Hughes is my favorite for the worst - completely clueless.

If you don't think anyone deserves it, don't vote.

It'll become quite clear when the poll is closed just how few people rated the players if there's not as many votes as usual.

My secretary has answered all your queries satisfactorily I hope? :thumbsup:

[Fez of Mahrez]

My secretary has answered all your queries satisfactorily I hope? :thumbsup:

LWICD would make a great secretary.

[Daggers]

LWICD would make a great secretary.

Does he make good coffee and what does he look like in stockings bent over a filing cabinet?

[Fez of Mahrez]

Does he make good coffee and what does he look like in stockings bent over a filing cabinet?

This new acronym feature is great Daggers, you should check it out.

[davieG]

They don't seem to work for me or am I being had?

aas

[Fez of Mahrez]

They don't seem to work for me or am I being had?

aas

I don't think acronyms are shit.

[davieG]

I don't think acronyms are shit.

How come I can see mine but not yours/ and yet you can see mine.

IASFC

[Fez of Mahrez]

How come I can see mine but not yours/ and yet you can see mine.

IASFC

It's not all so fooking confusing.

I'll put you out of your misery. You have to hover your mouse over the acronym.

i.e. >>> Hopefully you'll be able to read this.

[lookwhaticando]

Does he make good coffee and what does he look like in stockings bent over a filing cabinet?

I make a banging cuppa tea too.

And my stockings are my business.

You can look of course... just not when I'm wearing them.

[MC Prussian]

I'd like to nominate the 12th player - the fans.

With all the damage we've sustained so far, it's a miracle we're still around.

[Simi]

I'd like to nominate the 12th player - the fans.

With all the damage we've sustained so far, it's a miracle we're still around.

Amen to that. 2,000 at Stoke after QPR is impressive.

[Ultra]

But was it really 2000?

[davieG]

Amen to that. 2,000 at Stoke after QPR is impressive.

But was it really 2000?

According to the Stokies it was about 1400

[davieG]

Voting is now closed, thanks for your votes.

Running Totals

McAuley = 11 points - 3 outright wins

Hume = 9 points - 3 outright wins

Kisnorbo = 8.5 points - 1 outright win

Porter = 5 points

Logan = 4 points - 1 outright win

Kenton = 4 points

Henderson = 2 points

Stearman = 1 point

Fryatt = 1 point

Williams = 1 point

Low = 1 point

Horsfield = 0.5 point

March

Hume 30/48 = 3 points

McAuley 10/48 = 2 points

Kisnorbo 4/48 = 1 point

February

McAuley 62/106 = 3 points

Henderson 16/106 = 2 points

Horsfield / Kisnorbo 9/106 = 0.5 point each

January

McAuley 29/100 = 3 points

Kisnorbo 26/100 = 2 points

Fryatt 14/100 = 1 point

December

McAuley 34/111 = 3 points

Porter 32/111 = 2 points

Williams /111 = 1 pint

November

Hume 29/105 = 3 points

Porter 16/105 = 2 points

Stearman 13/105 = 1 point

Special mentions for Logan 12 points & Nissa 10 points

October

Hume 67/109 = 3 points

Kisnorbo 19/109 = 2 points

Logan 9/109 = 1 point

September

Logan 44 /101 = 3 points

Kenton 16/101 = 2 points

Porter 15/101 =1 point

August

Kisnorbo 70/124 = 3 points

Kenton 30/124 = 2 points

Low 11/124 = 1 point