Bryn Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 fook em, we seemed to play better when we took one off. Play McAuley, NEJ and Kisnorbo at the back and either 5 in midfield or 3 up front. I think it'd be a better option, they seem lacking anyway.
lildave3 Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 fook em, we seemed to play better when we took one off. Play McAuley, NEJ and Kisnorbo at the back and either 5 in midfield or 3 up front. I think it'd be a better option, they seem lacking anyway. We were always playing 4-4-2 weren't we? But yeah i'd like to play 3-5-2 or 3-4-3, although i'm not sure we have players capable of the formation.
Bryn Posted 17 April 2007 Author Posted 17 April 2007 Yeah but Barber seemed to suggest it was a 4-4-2 which sorta emalgamated into a 3-4-3.
Manwell Pablo Posted 17 April 2007 Posted 17 April 2007 Yeah but Barber seemed to suggest it was a 4-4-2 which sorta emalgamated into a 3-4-3. And after all the sports journalist of the year awards that bloke has won, we should all be listening to what he says.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.