Megson's team selection

[Thracian]

Lets not forget that in MA`s first game in charge he started Kish, Newton, Chambers and MDV. He quickly assessed the players and by the Watford game we had a good system and team out for a home game although Hume on the right was a risk that worked on this occasion. GM has probably taken some advice from his backroom staff, watched some DVDs and then made his own judgment but a lot of his decisions thus far havent been so great but some at Forest worked out well. As I mentioned before, he is without 22% of his best 11 with Clarke and Weso out and they are big players for us, especially Weso. Without them you would imagine that the side would not perform as well as we would with them.

I know its sounds like I am defending him but I`d like to see what happens against Stoke and Wolves first before having a real go!

He may have proved you right but there is absolutely no evidence that Clarke was God's gift to the left-back position. We conceded four goals in the 2.5 games that Clarke played in - virtually the same as we usually concede and the team played respectably enough both with him and without him. Wesolowski's loss is unquestionably a massive blow but I'm not at all convinced that we reacted in the best way.

[Manwell Pablo]

Stearman was recalled just for beacuse he scored, play school management. Chambers in midfield has James Chambers ever played midfield in his life? Megson would of been better off sticking him wide right and bringing Hume inside. Carl Cort, someone please explain why De Vries has been giving us solid performances.

There the obvious ones, I personally still don't see why Sheehans getting in infront of Porter or Ferrira or why Bruno was dropped.

On a side note I've just remebred Forest were after Fryatt when Megson was there, so he's obviously a fan.

The side, and bench was a defensive overload.

less than 52 goals = a free Nintendo Wii for me, have to say it's looking good.