lookwhaticando Posted 1 October 2007 Author Posted 1 October 2007 I bet it'd chafe too. Ah! That, boys, is the voice of experience. Harmonious, isn't it?
Rincewind Posted 1 October 2007 Posted 1 October 2007 i'm wondering if our ken would turn down a 24 year old were she to 'make herself available'? No I wouldn't it may surprise you. The thing is when young girls marry men of a senior age where not even a Tesco checkout girl will ask his age, and a telephone number bank balance to boot, it usually ends with a smile on the man's face. Killed by love. But I rarely see where an older bride's heart succombs to the passionate advances by her very active new very young spouse. So if he married for her money he may have to wait a while as she may well find a sudden spurt of revived energy making her feel at least 5 years younger. Good luck to him. They coild have 10 years of happy married bliss. Six more wives and he'll be marrying somebody of his own age and nobody will think that strange.
Rincewind Posted 1 October 2007 Posted 1 October 2007 Unfortunately, abusive or insulting words are not defamatory. Bad choice of word maybe but still worthy of a deletion by a mod. This tit for tat war of words has gone on long enough, and that sig proves it. Unless the four named see it as harmless fun and secretely admire Ultra for his witty use of words. Sometimes it is hard to tell where the line is between banter and insults for a third party.
Daggers Posted 1 October 2007 Posted 1 October 2007 Bad choice of word maybe but still worthy of a deletion by a mod.This tit for tat war of words has gone on long enough, and that sig proves it. Unless the four named see it as harmless fun and secretely admire Ultra for his witty use of words. Sometimes it is hard to tell where the line is between banter and insults for a third party. It's down to two now Ken - me and Fez are no longer worthy of an abusive Ultra sig. Oh the shame. Oh the ignominy. O tempora, o mores! Personally, the bloke is an absolute cock and I really couldn't give a stuff what he puts in his sig. What pisses me off is that he is such a social incompetent that at the sniff of a bad word he is sending PM's to all and sundry demanding public retractions and threatening court action. Recently, he demanded that myself and Manpa issued him a public apology for something (who knows/who cares?) upon threat that he would close down FoxesTalk. Now, he can continue to conjugate piss-poor puns if he wants...but to cover up for his pathetically small penis/career prospects/social circle by mouthing off about solicitors is ridiculously laughable. Personally, I'd ban him. He adds nothing to the life of the forum and simply serves to piss people off.
BigGibbo Posted 1 October 2007 Posted 1 October 2007 Not a very nice sig Ultra. Defanmation of character that is. Those four may not be perfect but they do not deserve that. Will I be added to the list now? I know somebody that does a good line in dummy's and huggies if you run out. As for the couple. It is weird, a bit like legalised granny rape, if I am allowed to say that without offending anyone. Aye can i be on the list i feel all left out & that
BigGibbo Posted 1 October 2007 Posted 1 October 2007 how cynical that sounds ; i'm sure there are lots of young men who find geriatric ladies beguiling without there being lots of dosh involved; heres a picture of another couple who have fallen hopelessly in love despite the age gap http://www.eonline.com/gossip/planetgossip...75-a3f3cd87ab7d I think fair play to the wrinklies she'll be dead before she realises its all bolox & what does she care then
Fez of Mahrez Posted 1 October 2007 Posted 1 October 2007 It's down to two now Ken - me and Fez are no longer worthy of an abusive Ultra sig.Oh the shame. Oh the ignominy. O tempora, o mores! Personally, the bloke is an absolute cock and I really couldn't give a stuff what he puts in his sig. What pisses me off is that he is such a social incompetent that at the sniff of a bad word he is sending PM's to all and sundry demanding public retractions and threatening court action. Recently, he demanded that myself and Manpa issued him a public apology for something (who knows/who cares?) upon threat that he would close down FoxesTalk. Now, he can continue to conjugate piss-poor puns if he wants...but to cover up for his pathetically small penis/career prospects/social circle by mouthing off about solicitors is ridiculously laughable. Personally, I'd ban him. He adds nothing to the life of the forum and simply serves to piss people off. Was I on there? Oh joy of joys. I've never even said anything that bad to the bloke. Did he give me a pathetic moniker too?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.