Stuliasz Posted 8 December 2008 Posted 8 December 2008 Leicester City 3-0 Southend United 6 December 2008 In-form City striker Matty Fryatt bagged his second man of the match in as many games after another hat-trick condemned Southend to defeat and cemented Leicester's position at the top of League One. Fryatt took his goal tally to 22 and his man of the match count to six beating strike partner Steve Howard to the top spot with Matt Oakley's making the top three on his return to the midfield after injury. There were also good marks after solid performances from Kerrea Gilbert on his return from a lengthy injury, Jack Hobbs on his return to the central defence after being shoved out to the right and a special mention should be reserved for Chris Powell who on his 750th appearance put in a performance which belied his age. Bruno Berner was voted City's poorest player on the day but it was still a respectable mark from the Swiss international on a day where City rarely looked troubled. Full results below: Player Awards: Man of the Match: Matty Fryatt – 9.04 Flop of the Match: Bruno Berner – 6.00 Best Defender: Kerrea Gilbert – 7.01 Best Midfielder: Matt Oakley – 7.29 Best Striker: Matty Fryatt – 9.04 Full Ratings: 1. Matty Fryatt – 9.04 2. Steve Howard – 7.63 3. Matt Oakley – 7.29 4. Kerrea Gilbert – 7.01 5. Jack Hobbs – 6.97 6. Aleksandar Tunchev / David Martin – 6.93 8. Chris Powell – 6.85 9. Mark Davies – 6.69 10. Andy King – 6.66 11. Michael Morrison – 6.28 12. Lloyd Dyer – 6.23 13. Bruno Berner – 6.00 Voter Awards: Top/Fairest Voters: davieG / Mike / milky / Bert / Anish / young66 / colsterfox / Scoweh / Dullshine / sheffieldfox / Fox You Forest / JoeyB / C-man / Dave / Willow / The_seer / ultra Most Generous Voter: 1st – manchester_foxes_fan – 7.77; 2nd – Keith – 7.62; 3rd – Andrew Corley / Narborough Bod – 7.54 Harshest Voter: 1st – Mark – 6.00; 2nd – Georg – 6.15; 3rd – homes – 6.23 (Anonymous voters are not included in the voter awards) Total Votes: 95 I decided against removing the flop of the match title - it's all a bit of fun really and for the community so I can't see the harm of keeping it in. It brings about a bit of debate if nothing else. If it's true that the players do look at these (which I very much doubt) then they should use it as a motivator.
Bert Posted 8 December 2008 Posted 8 December 2008 With how many top/fairest voters there are, this one seems to be the match where pretty much everyone agrees. Top work again Sheff.
Koke Posted 8 December 2008 Posted 8 December 2008 Just about right I'd say. 9.04 is probably the highest a player has got so far this season. Good work sheffield_fox
Stuliasz Posted 8 December 2008 Author Posted 8 December 2008 With how many top/fairest voters there are, this one seems to be the match where pretty much everyone agrees.Top work again Sheff. Well the match average fell right between two sets of marks so both had to be included but even so there were quite a few.
Jimmy Posted 8 December 2008 Posted 8 December 2008 if your that bothered you could call it weakest player instead of flop of the match
JoeyB Posted 8 December 2008 Posted 8 December 2008 Great work Sheff. Howard and Fryatt partnership finally getting the recognition it deserves.
clazkel Posted 8 December 2008 Posted 8 December 2008 oi thought king deserved more than a 6.66, i thought he played really well sat, best game he's had for a while. Apart from that the rest makes sense
Thracian Posted 9 December 2008 Posted 9 December 2008 oi thought king deserved more than a 6.66, i thought he played really well sat, best game he's had for a while. Apart from that the rest makes sense Lots of people thought he played well but he has his knockers who wouldn't rate him however he played. I thought it laughable that Davies finished above him. I like Davies, he seems to have some football in him. But he's a new lad and almost every time we get a new signing that get ridiculopusly overrated. Davies played a quarter of the match or thereabouts. It was a cameo appearance and it is comparatively easy to look bright for 20 minutes as opposed to 90. Had he genuinely influenced the outcome with a goal, an assist or a last ditch in terception I could understand it but he didn't. He just showed some decent touches and a willingness to be positive. King controlled central midfield and broke up the Southend moves which immediately preceded two of our goals if memory serves. His overall contribution was considerable - and over 90 minutes, something that Pearson, at least, seems to appreciate because I don't think the lad has been susbtituted once this season when he's started.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.