DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 12 May 2009 Posted 12 May 2009 What a narrow minded individual you really are Another addition to the ignore list Not really, just telling the truth thats all. If you dont like, then tough shit.
shen Posted 12 May 2009 Posted 12 May 2009 Not really, just telling the truth thats all. If you dont like, then tough shit. There's no 'truth'. And if you don't think there's quality music being made today, it just shows that you're too lazy to have a look around
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 12 May 2009 Author Posted 12 May 2009 There's no 'truth'. And if you don't think there's quality music being made today, it just shows that you're too lazy to have a look around Got better things to than waste my time on a wild goose chase.
Libertine Posted 12 May 2009 Posted 12 May 2009 Got better things to than waste my time on a wild goose chase. How about you stop wasting your time trying to convince everyone else to believe the same as you. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmightbeagoodideaehmayttttt.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 12 May 2009 Author Posted 12 May 2009 How about you stop wasting your time trying to convince everyone else to believe the same as you. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmightbeagoodideaehmayttttt. [/quote I got the time pal.no problem. Just had to start putting up with my step daughter playing one of Simple Plan cds. It aint playing now though, cause I just took the shite off. Shes been told not to play her muck in my house. Now, where were we? Talking about wasting time to convince people. I am not trying to convince anyone about anything, just stating the facts thats all. Wouldnt dream of trying to deprive you of your "fantastic" bands. No sir, not at all. As long as I dont have to put up with it, there is no problem.
Libertine Posted 12 May 2009 Posted 12 May 2009 I got the time pal.no problem. Just had to start putting up with my step daughter playing one of Simple Plan cds. It aint playing now though, cause I just took the shite off. Shes been told not to play her muck in my house.Now, where were we? Talking about wasting time to convince people. I am not trying to convince anyone about anything, just stating the facts thats all. Wouldnt dream of trying to deprive you of your "fantastic" bands. No sir, not at all. As long as I dont have to put up with it, there is no problem. Bet she loves you eh. Act your age, kid.
shen Posted 12 May 2009 Posted 12 May 2009 Got better things to than waste my time on a wild goose chase. It just means you're lazy AND arrogant then. I could easily say that music hasn't improved since the classical period. As much as I like Pink Floyd, they're not a patch on the geniusses of those days. But if you choose to be a musically pretentious and narrow-minded git, then that's your loss, not ours.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 13 May 2009 Author Posted 13 May 2009 It just means you're lazy AND arrogant then. I could easily say that music hasn't improved since the classical period. As much as I like Pink Floyd, they're not a patch on the geniusses of those days. But if you choose to be a musically pretentious and narrow-minded git, then that's your loss, not ours. Your entitled to your opinion, just the same as me. Slag me off all you like, it simply doesnt bother me one little bit. I might come across as arrogant, and maybe I am, but so what? Where do you get the idea that I am lazy from? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Thats really funny.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 13 May 2009 Author Posted 13 May 2009 Bet she loves you eh. Act your age, kid. [/quote She can play it when I am not around.
shen Posted 13 May 2009 Posted 13 May 2009 Your entitled to your opinion, just the same as me. Slag me off all you like, it simply doesnt bother me one little bit. I might come across as arrogant, and maybe I am, but so what? Where do you get the idea that I am lazy from? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Thats really funny. Because admittedly you have to look for the good music out there. It's not served on a plate like back in your 60s and 70s, and the fact you can't be bothered to look for it, and subsequently slag off contemporary music, is because you're arrogant and lazy
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 17 May 2009 Author Posted 17 May 2009 Because admittedly you have to look for the good music out there. It's not served on a plate like back in your 60s and 70s, and the fact you can't be bothered to look for it, and subsequently slag off contemporary music, is because you're arrogant and lazy Wow! A real comedian Were you around in the sixties? If not, then why make an immature comment about music being served up on a plate? It most certainly wasnt, but this appears to be the case today. Go back to your playpen sonny and suck your dummy.
shen Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 Wow! A real comedian Were you around in the sixties? If not, then why make an immature comment about music being served up on a plate? It most certainly wasnt, but this appears to be the case today. Go back to your playpen sonny and suck your dummy. My point was that many of the 'mainstream' bands back then produced some very good music, and most of them would be household names today and rightfully so. Admittedly the 60s and 70s had their share of tripe too, but not on the same level as today. My argument is simply that most of todays 'mainstream'/readily accessible music is average or below par, but that doesn't mean that the good bands have disappeared, quite the opposite. As has been pointed out in other threads where you figure, you just have to scratch the surface a bit and lo behold, a lot of very interesting, innovative and not least talented bands appear. I can only assume why you paint all contemporary bands with the same brush, instead of moving out of your comfort zone and have a look around.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 17 May 2009 Author Posted 17 May 2009 My point was that many of the 'mainstream' bands back then produced some very good music, and most of them would be household names today and rightfully so. Admittedly the 60s and 70s had their share of tripe too, but not on the same level as today. My argument is simply that most of todays 'mainstream'/readily accessible music is average or below par, but that doesn't mean that the good bands have disappeared, quite the opposite. As has been pointed out in other threads where you figure, you just have to scratch the surface a bit and lo behold, a lot of very interesting, innovative and not least talented bands appear. I can only assume why you paint all contemporary bands with the same brush, instead of moving out of your comfort zone and have a look around. Now that is a much clearer and more adult reply. I take your point, but I have to say that about half my 60s music IS by bands I had to hunt down, and their names would not be known today This was music which was different, and superior in many ways, to some of the big names of the day. I can accept the fact that there must be some good music out there now,and if you find it and enjoy it, then good for you.
Libertine Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 People are only resorting to insulting you because you're initiating that. If you want proper discussion, start it and it'll carry on.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 17 May 2009 Author Posted 17 May 2009 People are only resorting to insulting you because you're initiating that. If you want proper discussion, start it and it'll carry on. [/quoteI acknowledge your words of wisdom, but I cannot, perhaps sadly, change my character. If I feel strongly about something, then I go the whole hog. Its just a me thing.
Guest Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 FFS, will you stop deleting the ] when you quote messages?
ASH17LCFC Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 Oh who gives a toss about anything you say ? Your like a liverpool fan living on past glories. Half the bands you bang on about are dead or ought to be. When one of your bands plays to 250,000 paying people for 2 nights, then i will give you respect.
Filbert_Ross Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 Oh who gives a toss about anything you say ? Your like a liverpool fan living on past glories. Half the bands you bang on about are dead or ought to be.When one of your bands plays to 250,000 paying people for 2 nights, then i will give you respect. haha hats off mate. like it.
Edmund Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 Are you a music version of He's not Bald? No an older version of ASH17LCFC
The Reverend Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 I've only read one of dangerous tigers posts, and I already know he's a cunt. Feel sorry for you lot who have had to endure more. Ignored.
Ultra Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 Oh who gives a toss about anything you say ? Your like a liverpool fan living on past glories. Half the bands you bang on about are dead or ought to be.When one of your bands plays to 250,000 paying people for 2 nights, then i will give you respect. Like the Rolling Stones? Or the Who?
shen Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 Now that is a much clearer and more adult reply. I take your point, but I have to say that about half my 60s music IS by bands I had to hunt down, and their names would not be known today This was music which was different, and superior in many ways, to some of the big names of the day. I can accept the fact that there must be some good music out there now,and if you find it and enjoy it, then good for you. So what exactly is your gripe with contemporary music? It shouldn't come as a surprise that most of the mainstream music isn't inspiring. However your earlier comment about music being more varied back then seems completely unfounded. As mentioned by James, there are a host of sub- and cross-genres that are taking music into so many different directions. Granted, you'll hear a lot of stuff that doesn't sound great, while other stuff will be quite challenging to your ear or to your perception of 'proper music'. But with so much going on, there's bound to be music being done now that even you should like, so why this conservative attitude?
ASH17LCFC Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 Like the Rolling Stones? Or the Who? Yeah because they are setting the world alight Nobody gives a fook about either now. Washed up, living of the glory days.
shen Posted 17 May 2009 Posted 17 May 2009 Oh who gives a toss about anything you say ? Your like a liverpool fan living on past glories. Half the bands you bang on about are dead or ought to be.When one of your bands plays to 250,000 paying people for 2 nights, then i will give you respect. But tell me, how succesful have Oasis been outside the UK, say compared to the Stones? Hmmm? Even though Oasis are relatively big on the world stage, their fame has mainly revolved around their sales and popularity in the UK
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.