ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/576331/26d...ight_stuff.html Reports suggested he became a recluse, get him in the ring, ding! ding!
lavrentis Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Seen this before. Seen the mans Documentary as well. Blokes name is Bart Sibrel.
Hugo Sanchez Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 http://www.dumpert.nl/mediabase/576331/26d...ight_stuff.htmlReports suggested he became a recluse, get him in the ring, ding! ding! No he said he didn't walk on the moon, Armstrong is a recluse.
BoneDog Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 No-one has walked on the moon. Apart from those folk who lived there about 20,000 years ago of course.
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Author Posted 22 July 2009 No he said he didn't walk on the moon, Armstrong is a recluse. Apollogies folks. I heard that if a human was to go as far as the moon, radiation would kill them before they could return, this true?
Flynny Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 No-one has walked on the moon. Apart from those folk who lived there about 20,000 years ago of course. I actually don't know if you're joking or not.
lavrentis Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Apollogies folks.I heard that if a human was to go as far as the moon, radiation would kill them before they could return, this true? You mean from the Van Allen belts?
ob1kanobe0 Posted 22 July 2009 Author Posted 22 July 2009 You mean from the Van Allen belts? Look, my name might be taken from one of those star wars geezers, but that doesn't mean i understand the solar system. The Moon used to be 14,000 miles from earth, now 210,000 miles, thats about it.
Hugo Sanchez Posted 22 July 2009 Posted 22 July 2009 Apollogies folks.I heard that if a human was to go as far as the moon, radiation would kill them before they could return, this true? What has been said, but there been alot of given reason why Man hasn't walked on the moon. Did anyone watch the Moon landing 40th anniversary on Sky News ? If they're lying, they are bloody good at it.
BoneDog Posted 23 July 2009 Posted 23 July 2009 I actually don't know if you're joking or not. I suppose it is hard to tell on these subjects! Anyway, no I'm not joking. I was lying a bit cos I'm not sure of the dates, I made up 20,000 years. But I do believe the Americans never went there, and I do believe that it was inhabited at some point long ago. I like Professor Richard C Hoagland and he has done some good work on the subject of monuments on Mars and the Moon. Arthur C Clarke worked with him at some point I think. Clarke also used to talk about NASA's lies (and Clarke was a major player in this kind of stuff, he used to be in contact with all the top guys). Hoagland has a good website but it is much better to hear him talk. He is a very good scientist and does alot of work in labs testing technology. Here's a bit about Hoagland : "Richard C. Hoagland is a former space science museum curator; a former NASA consultant, and during the historic Apollo Missions to the Moon, was science advisor to Walter Cronkite and CBS News. For over 20 years, Hoagland has been leading an outside scientific team in a critically acclaimed independent analysis of possible intelligently-designed artifacts on Mars. Richard and his team\'s investigations have been quietly extended to include over 30 years of previously hidden data from NASA, Soviet, and Pentagon missions to the Moon"
Daggers Posted 23 July 2009 Posted 23 July 2009 But I do believe the Americans never went there, and I do believe that it was inhabited at some point long ago. Ignorance like this genuinely frightens me.
Sir Fynwy Posted 23 July 2009 Posted 23 July 2009 I suppose it is hard to tell on these subjects!Anyway, no I'm not joking. I was lying a bit cos I'm not sure of the dates, I made up 20,000 years. But I do believe the Americans never went there, and I do believe that it was inhabited at some point long ago. I like Professor Richard C Hoagland and he has done some good work on the subject of monuments on Mars and the Moon. Arthur C Clarke worked with him at some point I think. Clarke also used to talk about NASA's lies (and Clarke was a major player in this kind of stuff, he used to be in contact with all the top guys). Hoagland has a good website but it is much better to hear him talk. He is a very good scientist and does alot of work in labs testing technology. Here's a bit about Hoagland : "Richard C. Hoagland is a former space science museum curator; a former NASA consultant, and during the historic Apollo Missions to the Moon, was science advisor to Walter Cronkite and CBS News. For over 20 years, Hoagland has been leading an outside scientific team in a critically acclaimed independent analysis of possible intelligently-designed artifacts on Mars. Richard and his team\'s investigations have been quietly extended to include over 30 years of previously hidden data from NASA, Soviet, and Pentagon missions to the Moon" How can you believe this shit? If no one went to the moon the Russians amongst others would take great delight in outing it, they didn't because it actually happenened. If you are happy to believe a few nuts rather than the bulk of the evidence you are a fool. Buzz has a huge chip on his shoulder and had lots of personal problems after returning from the moon.
stez Posted 23 July 2009 Posted 23 July 2009 punching someone is certainly easier than answering the question truthfully. seriously though, it's, surely, conceivable (to get one over on the ruskies) to've faked at least the first 'landing' but having got there legitimately later on, don't forget it 'had to be done before the decade was out' i'm just putting it out there, govenments are capable of pulling the wool over peoples eyes, though.
Edmund Posted 23 July 2009 Posted 23 July 2009 I heard that if a human was to go as far as the moon, radiation would kill them before they could return, this true? Professor Richard C Hoagland and he has done some good work on the subject of monuments on Mars and the Moon. Monuments Are you talking about the face on mars which is just a mountain range? Does anyone remember this : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-50...Red-Planet.html What a load of bull.
BoneDog Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 How can you believe this shit? If no one went to the moon the Russians amongst others would take great delight in outing it, they didn't because it actually happenened. If you are happy to believe a few nuts rather than the bulk of the evidence you are a fool.Buzz has a huge chip on his shoulder and had lots of personal problems after returning from the moon. Yeah cos the Russians and US leaders are really enemies aren't they!! They really nearly had a nuclear war in the 60's or 70's! HA If you believe that these countries leaders are really enemies, then you are the fool. Check out the bulk of the evidence, Saudi, US, Russian and the list goes on, they all get together and have a great time laughing and joking. Not a theory, a fact.
BoneDog Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 Ignorance like this genuinely frightens me. Really? What is to be scared about? I am in the minority after all
BoneDog Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 How can you believe this shit? If no one went to the moon the Russians amongst others would take great delight in outing it, they didn't because it actually happenened. If you are happy to believe a few nuts rather than the bulk of the evidence you are a fool.Buzz has a huge chip on his shoulder and had lots of personal problems after returning from the moon. I never mentioned Buzz! So are you saying that Richard C Hoagland is a nutter? I'm not saying I believe all he says cos I don't follow his work that much, so I don't know. But I do know that NASA top brass lie to the general public and cover up big things. But I suppose that you may believe that they lie cos 'the general public' wouldn't be able to handle the truth. We would all panic eh.
BoneDog Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 Monuments Are you talking about the face on mars which is just a mountain range? No, not talking about that. Although the later NASA photos of that have been filtered and brushed before they showed them to you. I'm talking about other photos I have seen from Mars missions of allsorts of stuff. And I'm talking about live feed videos from NASA's own channel. Of course, when something starts happening, the feeds get cut after about 25 seconds. Have you ever seen the live feeds from NASA's cameras on the space stations? I've seen hundreds of hours cos I love it, and now and then you see things come into view. And these things do 45 or 90 degree turns, or a total turn around. Or stop, and speed up again.
BoneDog Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 Ignorance like this genuinely frightens me. We can't all be great enlightened ones like yourself. I bow down to your superiority Monuments Are you talking about the face on mars which is just a mountain range? By the way, who says it is a mountain range?
Sir Fynwy Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 Why is it always the emptiest vessels that make the most noise?
BoneDog Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 Why is it always the emptiest vessels that make the most noise? I don't know boss. We can't all be magnificent humans like yourself. If only more people were like you eh, everything would be alright. And I don't make much noise, I just post a few things that you don't agree with, and they touch a nerve for some reason. Then you have a go I wouldn't let my mad ramblings upset you pet, it's only an opinion
Sir Fynwy Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 I've actualy met Buzz and a quite a lot of people from NASA (including visiting flight control at the Cape), if they are all acting they are all the best actors in the world and should be in Hollywood earning millions not fooking around with shitty NASA salaries.
BoneDog Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 I've actualy met Buzz and a quite a lot of people from NASA (including visiting flight control at the Cape), if they are all acting they are all the best actors in the world and should be in Hollywood earning millions not fooking around with shitty NASA salaries. They aren't all actors at NASA. Most are not, most are doing a good job. I only think (because of what others say) that information about Mars, the Moon and unidentified objects is being held back. As for the moon landings, my belief could well be wrong and they might of happened I just think that if they went there in the 60's that they would of been back in the 90's and 2000's. Did Buzz see a ufo?
lildave3 Posted 24 July 2009 Posted 24 July 2009 Really? What is to be scared about? I am in the minority after all We can't all be great enlightened ones like yourself. I bow down to your superiority I especially like the fact you responded to him once, and then later on thought of a more sarcastic post so replied again. Brilliant.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.