Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
GLC

Higs Bosan 'may have been glimpsed'

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's like catching a glimpse of the flesh on a woman between the stocking top and the knickers. It gets you wondering what's inside the knickers and what does it look like. My idea of heaven.

Posted

It's like catching a glimpse of the flesh on a woman between the stocking top and the knickers. It gets you wondering what's inside the knickers and what does it look like. My idea of heaven.

If you're lucky, like a rose, ready to be savoured.

If you're unlucky, like a mountain gorilla which has self harmed.

Posted

I'm waiting to see what Miles Mathis has to say about this because those guys at CERN cannot be trusted! Probably.

A glimpse of Miles below. I only started reading him because I heard Dawkins call him either a crank or a crackpot, so I thought, "Arrr, this Miles fellow must be onto something then. I must check him out".

http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/miles-mathis-democracy-in-science/

http://milesmathis.com/neutrino.pdf

Interesting reading whether you agree with him or not I think.

Posted

I'm waiting to see what Miles Mathis has to say about this because those guys at CERN cannot be trusted! Probably.

A glimpse of Miles below. I only started reading him because I heard Dawkins call him either a crank or a crackpot, so I thought, "Arrr, this Miles fellow must be onto something then. I must check him out".

http://tallbloke.wor...acy-in-science/

http://milesmathis.com/neutrino.pdf

Interesting reading whether you agree with him or not I think.

Mathis is a woolgatherer who gets off on standing apart from the scientific crowd. He does make an interesting point on the idea of the 'democratisation' of scientific research - after all, some of the greatest and most widely accepted scientific theories today were generated by individuals who thought unconventionally, and I do agree that collectivism in research may not be the best idea - but he overexaggerates the problems and questions the integrity of pretty much every scientific researcher out there.

Basically, he's the science version of Ron Paul - some really good ideas, but far too polemic to be taken 100% seriously.

Back on topic - the people down at CERN have a lot more work to do before this can be made official. Elementary particle physics has always been a remarkably tough area to get verifiable results in anyway, as observation is pretty fvcking difficult when what you're trying to observe is smaller than the wavelength of the radiation you're using to observe it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...