BoneDog Posted 18 September 2013 Posted 18 September 2013 Seems an all round sensible approach to take. If this was 2003 and not 2013 I'm pretty sure we wouldn't have given them the opportunity to reach a non-military solution. In that sense it's good to see we seem to have learned some lessons from the past. Only the first part of this post is in reply to you, the rest is me waffling to nobody in particular. Who do you think has learned some lessons? Do you think that the people at the top who will make billions from this action in Syria, Iran and Lebanon now don't want to go to war? Personally I think that they've just put it all on hold for a short while. It isn't Assad that has destroyed Syria, it is whoever gave the terrorists the green light to go ahead. Assad reacted to what was unleashed on Syria 3 years ago. There are no non-military solutions. We have sent in tens of thousands of terrorists - who aren't Syrians, and have armed them with allsorts and let them loose. More are entering the country all the time with our help. They'll be in Syria for years to come now and Syria is f*&ked, just like Libya, Iraq and wherever else. Everywhere we have 'liberated' recently is now a terrorist hotbed in a whole heap of shit far worse than they were before the West came to the rescue. A CIA, Mossad and other intelligence agency backed terrorist hotbed at that. Saddam and Gadaffi for example did a good job of keeping Al Qaeda out of their countries until we stepped in. Now they run free in those countries. Our 'leaders' in the West and many of our population are now on the same side as double agents like Prince Bandar, Belhadj and a long list of other terrorists who we now call freedom fighters. To call it ridiculous would be an understatement. These terrorists pretend to be Muslim too, while in reality they kill real Muslims and Christians everywhere they go. I suppose it all helps reinforce the belief in the Western mind that Islam is a terrorist religion. It's like somebody somewhere is trying to create an excuse to drop another big nuke or ten (but that's just idle speculation). On a related note, I'm surprised that far more people don't notice that every 'Muslim' terrorist organisation that exists have connections to some intelligence agency or another.
BoneDog Posted 18 September 2013 Posted 18 September 2013 Latest reports are that Syria will agree to hand their chemical weapons over to the international community. Good news. Hasn't Assad said that he will only comply if we stop arming the foreign terrorists in his country? Not sure about that but I heard it a few days back. I'm pretty sure there will be another twist in the next week or two.
I am Rod Hull Posted 3 October 2013 Posted 3 October 2013 I think this is a better place for your post, El Empty This is the most incredible thing I've seen this week. First we had everyone talking about the Syrian letter on news channels all around the world. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqY_W29Eo2M And then we had Griffin's speech (which was by far the best politicians speech of the month). I only started watching it for a laugh but was hugely surprised at the content.
Guest MattP Posted 3 October 2013 Posted 3 October 2013 That is absolutely fascinating, best speech I've seen for a while and an incredible account of events. You won't see that on the BBC!
Zingari Posted 3 October 2013 Posted 3 October 2013 That was well worth listening to, lots of surprising content thanks Rod and Bonedog
purpleronnie Posted 3 October 2013 Posted 3 October 2013 Great stuff nick griffin...link to this on David Icke.com Like the comments.
BoneDog Posted 3 October 2013 Posted 3 October 2013 I think this is a better place for your post, El Empty Good point, I forgot about this thread Like the comments. I know what you mean about some Youtube comments, but we shouldn't let that get in the way of a videos contents. Youtube isn't known for it's reasonable discussions in the comment section! I know you mock the Ickester, but the 'Todays News' section of that forum has a few decent 'debates' quite often. There are some quite knowlegable people on there. Not sure about the other parts of that forum though as I only read the Todays News section if I visit the place.
lavrentis Posted 4 October 2013 Posted 4 October 2013 Good point, I forgot about this thread I know what you mean about some Youtube comments, but we shouldn't let that get in the way of a videos contents. Youtube isn't known for it's reasonable discussions in the comment section! I know you mock the Ickester, but the 'Todays News' section of that forum has a few decent 'debates' quite often. There are some quite knowlegable people on there. Not sure about the other parts of that forum though as I only read the Todays News section if I visit the place. I think Icke takes it too far but you certainly have to be open to all perspectives. He is right when he says we are conditioned into a way of thinking and anything outside the norm is madness to us.
purpleronnie Posted 4 October 2013 Posted 4 October 2013 I think Icke takes it too far but you certainly have to be open to all perspectives. He is right when he says we are conditioned into a way of thinking and anything outside the norm is madness to us. Not sure that claiming we're decendants of some kind of alien reptiles, malevolent in nature, sometimes ‘shape-shift’ into human form is taking it too far at all.
lavrentis Posted 4 October 2013 Posted 4 October 2013 Not sure that claiming we're decendants of some kind of alien reptiles, malevolent in nature, sometimes ‘shape-shift’ into human form is taking it too far at all. Pardon ?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.