Katy Posted 9 August 2005 Posted 9 August 2005 So what we going to do about it? 153345[/snapback] Dunno you tell me bud
rossporterlc Posted 9 August 2005 Posted 9 August 2005 so if a kid goes in a shop and steals a penny sweet..he/she is going to be killed because of it?
Thracian Posted 9 August 2005 Author Posted 9 August 2005 I have a solution for criminals. It's very, very simple.Any criminal who repeat offends, whether it's as petty as shoplifting or happy slapping is sentenced to death. This will stamp out wasters in this world who go through their life committing crime after crime and wasting tax payers money. These people have no place in society and serve no purpose what so ever. You often hear about people who have been in out and out prison all their life with various offences and then they go and kill somebody. Prison does re-abilitate some individuals but for some it only serves a period of time for them to become more demoralised and dangerous to this world. So although it might seem a little harsh, if anybody commits a crime then they have a chance to redeem themselves. If they then commit the same or a similar crime again then they are executed. This will save taxpayers money and prisons will be alot less over-crowded. My solution might have a few flaws and i'm sure there would be some people setting other people up and getting them wrongfully killed, but I think on the whole it would resolve quite alot of shit that happens in this country. 153061[/snapback] It's ironic hearing you say that. Having, on this forum, predicted the first executions in the UK under Sharia law within a couple of decades it looks like the Muslims extremists might yet get us to build the framework of capital laws for them!!!. Personally I've never understood why it costs the nation a single penny to imprison criminals (it certainly wouldn't under my regime) but, as I've said before, killing people is one of the things we should be trying to put an end to because it only provokes retribution/manipulation and is inevitably unsafe or unfair. Ric Flair did touch on the most blatant drawback to his own idea and that is the "set up" because unscrupulous people have always taken advantage of capital punishment laws with relish. Imagine the Muslim fundamentalist clerics/religious dogmatists gaining a foothold on our councils as they undoubtedly have in some places. They show precious little tolerance with a benign set of laws in place so what would they be like with executioners around to keep busy. Now the anti-treason laws...I've long wondered why they've not been applied for so long - and retrospectively if necessary.
Guest Posted 9 August 2005 Posted 9 August 2005 You used to have to incur the cost of your own internment back in the 'olden days'. Perhaps this is worth considering before we start taking extreme measures.
lush Posted 9 August 2005 Posted 9 August 2005 Dunno you tell me bud 153347[/snapback] Is that meant as in friend, or flower? Im not `allowed` to honestly answer that one, you`d better ask someone else. `ross`, dont be silly old crust. I would imagine the death penalty be of a sensible nature (as it is of serious importance), those that have reached the age of 21, be subject to that law.
lush Posted 10 August 2005 Posted 10 August 2005 d) I doubt you can now travel any main road in England without being monitored. 152620[/snapback] Maybe we need more? "Detectives hunting sex attackers who raped three women and tried to abduct two more in a town centre. Women in Northampton have been warned not to go out alone after dark following the attacks, which happened over the past 10 days."
Ric Flair Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 so if a kid goes in a shop and steals a penny sweet..he/she is going to be killed because of it? 153374[/snapback] Only if they committed that crime or a similar crime again after being punished the first time. I've got no time for serial offenders in thsi world, even for smallish crimes. If people aren't capable of learning from their mistakes and being re-habilitated then they should be removed from this world.
rossporterlc Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Only if they committed that crime or a similar crime again after being punished the first time. I've got no time for serial offenders in thsi world, even for smallish crimes.If people aren't capable of learning from their mistakes and being re-habilitated then they should be removed from this world. 154825[/snapback] i still think in most cases that would be really harsh though
lush Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 i still think in most cases that would be really harsh though 155006[/snapback] So whats the answer to repeat offenders?
Katy Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Is that meant as in friend, or flower?Im not `allowed` to honestly answer that one, you`d better ask someone else. `ross`, dont be silly old crust. I would imagine the death penalty be of a sensible nature (as it is of serious importance), those that have reached the age of 21, be subject to that law. 153394[/snapback] Forgive my flippency lush, you asked me though and I replied, now your asking me to ask someone else the question you asked 'me'
AyewJoking Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Forgive my flippency lush, you asked me though and I replied, now your asking me to ask someone else the question you asked 'me' 155113[/snapback] Well I'm confused
lush Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Forgive my flippency lush, you asked me though and I replied, now your asking me to ask someone else the question you asked 'me' 155113[/snapback] I believe ive found the answer (but in society that answer is seriously frowned upon) which is more than what you do?
Katy Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 I believe ive found the answer (but in society that answer is seriously frowned upon) which is more than what you do? 155146[/snapback] What kind of English is that?
lush Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Not good English, i must admit. I believe ive found the answer, which is more than what you`ve found? Is that better?
Katy Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Not good English, i must admit.I believe ive found the answer, which is more than what you`ve found? Is that better? 155158[/snapback] Thats perfect thanks, I bow to your superior knowledge.
lush Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Thats perfect thanks, I bow to your superior knowledge. 155165[/snapback] ...i dont think you would, but i could be wrong.
Katy Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 ...i dont think you would, but i could be wrong. 155176[/snapback] Another of lifes great mysteries we are so fond of there lush.
lush Posted 11 August 2005 Posted 11 August 2005 Another of lifes great mysteries we are so fond of there lush. 155180[/snapback] Not understanding what you mean there sweetheart.
Rincewind Posted 12 August 2005 Posted 12 August 2005 It would do away with the 12 point system on your driving as well. Another good thing, it would cut down the traffic congestion at rush hour. Also be careful when parking. A minute over the time twice and Rita the heavenly meter maid will be stamping your exit ticket.
lush Posted 12 August 2005 Posted 12 August 2005 A minute over the time twice and Rita the heavenly meter maid will be stamping your exit ticket. 155283[/snapback] Damn those idiots that think the roads are there only for them. I say we teach selfish idiots that theres others who live in their society, and that they (you aswell i suppose) learn, REEEE-SPECT!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.