leicesterweb Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 http://www.bbc.co.uk/leicester/content/art...w_feature.shtml Plus video of Nils-Eric Johansson and audio previews with Craig Levein and Stephen Hughes...
fosseman Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 Some paranoid folk might think a transfer is in the offing!
Anish Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 Bad news, we need Connolly badly. If he isn't I hope Elvis gets the nod ahead of Dublin, we need a bit of pace and mobility, and the thought of a Dublin-De Vries partnership doens't fill me with excitement.
Thracian Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 a) It'll be interesting to see how the team manages without Connolly (whatever the reasons) if, of course, it happens. b) I agree with giving Elvis a full game in his preferred position alongside MDV with Dublin as substitute. It's an ideal opportunity to see how good he really is. But, for God's sake play with wide men and go for three points as well. If we're going to be a football team and we're going to put people on empty seats again then we don't need two Dobermen in midfield.
Simon Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 a) It'll be interesting to see how the team manages without Connolly (whatever the reasons) if, of course, it happens.b) I agree with giving Elvis a full game in his preferred position alongside MDV with Dublin as substitute. It's an ideal opportunity to see how good he really is. But, for God's sake play with wide men and go for three points as well. If we're going to be a football team and we're going to put people on empty seats again then we don't need two Dobermen in midfield. 158539[/snapback] Dublin might be needed to play in defence at this rate (although Craig does say he thinks Paddy and Gerrbrand will be OK for Saturday).
Stuliasz Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 Connolly had best be fit for Saturday, Hammond may have a lot of pace but as soon as he is found out like Sylla they will man mark him and he'll be out of the game.
culllcfc Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 I’v been reading this forum for a few week and thought i'd register to post on this topic. Iv just got back from a pub in Rothley and Craig Levein was there. May mate spoke to him about the game on sat and apparently both Connolly and de Vries are doubtful with minor injuries. If neither can play then the two forwards are going to be Dion and Elvis. Straight form the mouth of Levein
Anish Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 What are they doing in training these days? It seems we are picking up injuries left, right and centre already and this is only the second week of the season!
Scow Posted 18 August 2005 Posted 18 August 2005 A strikeforce of de Vries and Hammond - A combined total of 2 goals in English football.
leicesterweb Posted 19 August 2005 Author Posted 19 August 2005 If Connolly is out, it would be good to see Elis get 90 minutes - see what he's got. But I'd prefer Con...
Guest Posted 19 August 2005 Posted 19 August 2005 I'm hoping that it's a ploy to lull the opposition into a sense of false security.
Scow Posted 19 August 2005 Posted 19 August 2005 I'm hoping that it's a ploy to lull the opposition into a sense of false security. 158928[/snapback] I wouldn't be surprised - Take the example of Sylla against Ipswich.
Hitesh Posted 19 August 2005 Posted 19 August 2005 Would like to see Connolly play but if not, i hope Elvis can score a few jsut to prove his worth!
rossporterlc Posted 20 August 2005 Posted 20 August 2005 scored two without him, i still thinking what could have been though
Hitesh Posted 20 August 2005 Posted 20 August 2005 He would of scored the chance that Hammond missed apparently.
Wellman Posted 20 August 2005 Posted 20 August 2005 He would of scored the chance that Hammond missed apparently. 159832[/snapback] We aren't to know until we see it on the tv
Hitesh Posted 20 August 2005 Posted 20 August 2005 We aren't to know until we see it on the tv 159838[/snapback] Thats why i said apparently! Ie. Going by the commentary.
Wellman Posted 20 August 2005 Posted 20 August 2005 Thats why i said apparently! Ie. Going by the commentary. 159895[/snapback]
rossporterlc Posted 20 August 2005 Posted 20 August 2005 Thats why i said apparently! Ie. Going by the commentary. 159895[/snapback] was this an earlier chance because i have only just started listening to it
Wellman Posted 20 August 2005 Posted 20 August 2005 was this an earlier chance because i have only just started listening to it 159900[/snapback] yep
Bluefoxtim Posted 20 August 2005 Posted 20 August 2005 well at least we know we CAN score without Connors. Yes we may have scored a couple more (like Elvis chance if 1st half) But we have still scored two without first choice strikers
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.