Chrysalis

I agree, but sadly it will never happen. We have adopted financial regulations designed to protect the status quo, and we then seen in the women's game the pure brutality when certain teams jumped to the top 2 divisions and a club was forcefully relegated to make room. The natural order has meaning in football.

I bang on about possession but its not tbad to have the ball, its how its used. Typically teams that use possession well, wont mess about at the back (unless the game is already comfortably won), they get it in the opponents half quickly, and thats when the fancy play starts. The good teams of course usually have the right players for it as well.

Especially as our training ground played no part in our recent success, and the big money sales.

only first party debt. we also will be losing money during this season so new debt will build up.

0.6 points deduction per charge, all imposed in a single season only, no forced sale of club, no ban from the EPL. Wouldnt surprise me if the UEFA ban ends up being longer when its an EPL charge.

Its a joke, many of us knew it would be.

Cant find anything on youtube for this.

I feel nothing, no emotion, wanting new owners.

Yet we have a fair few who think the manager is just the problem.

AKCJ has beat me to it really, this is similar to the mens situation, it needs the ownership fixing first before the rest can be focused on.

You think a player joined us from an EPL club to be paid a pittance, its clear we still giving out lucrative contracts. Glad we agree on Seagrave. I also think Seagrave will likely hinder a sale unless there is plans by the new owner to borrow against it to offset purchase cost.

No, the ownership is many magnitudes more important than the manager and football results at the moment. If anything the shambolic manager is doing well to distract from Top with his poor results being a talking point.

I think the youth are, the signings seem to be poor though. They not good enough if they trying to emulate man city whilst in league one. They good enough if we play to maximise every player.

I seen in the clip we had nearly 30k attendance for that game? Are that many really still going?

I do agree with you. I think the question of should they punished for breaking the rules, and the question should the rules even exist are two separate ones. I agree with you 100%, that PSR/FFP is all about making sure only the established clubs can spend big money, they want a in built advantage, and got stroppy when other teams started competing with them financially. I hope that clarifies my position. Also agree that the club is obviously well run in the football area, if you useless in this area, you can still fail whilst spending huge sums.

OP you missed the relegation thread started on Saturday? I will paste my reply from there to here, since no one responded to it. We probably need another relegation in all honestly, it will make KP sell for less, and thats the "only" important thing right now. I will say it again, owner change is more important than footballing results at the moment. More important than promotion/relegation 100%. I can see a promotion hurting us as it may take the club of the market. As for betting, I couldnt do it when I wanted to, for some reason pre season only one bookie was offering relegation odds, and their site was scuffed so couldnt place it, as a result, I now see anything lower than 50/1 as bad value, as that was the odds I wanted to place. If I dont see 50/1 no bet will be placed, and I expect those odds arent coming back now.

Still no punishment, its as if the EPL are only doing all this under duress.

If there was a highlight feature, pin this post on the home page, and let this drill in to every member on here.

Thanks for your analysis, this isnt surprising at all, basically we want to play a certain way, but dont build a squad for it, we have also consistently had energy and motivational issues since moving in to Seagrave. The conditions are simply too good. The owner and DoF simply think it can be coached in to any player.

Correction until KP are gone.

I bet still no stadium protests, fan base is so passive. Owners really need to be made to feel uncomfortable, there was that one game where some lads forced a social media video (which was claimed to be unrelated), and then we have gone soft after again.

Rudkin has served one useful purpose now, he has put to bed the claims Top doesnt get involved at the club, with only those he trusts failing him. Some of us knew Top was involved.

As will the replacement who plays the same way.

We probably need another relegation in all honestly, it will make KP sell for less, and thats the "only" important thing right now. I will say it again, owner change is more important than footballing results at the moment. More important than promotion/relegation 100%. I can see a promotion hurting us as it may take the club of the market. As for betting, I couldnt do it when I wanted to, for some reason pre season only one bookie was offering relegation odds, and their site was scuffed so couldnt place it, as a result, I now see anything lower than 50/1 as bad value, as that was the odds I wanted to place. If I dont see 50/1 no bet will be placed, and I expect those odds arent coming back now.

Who do you think picked out the manager, look there.