Chrysalis

I agree, but sadly it will never happen. We have adopted financial regulations designed to protect the status quo, and we then seen in the women's game the pure brutality when certain teams jumped to the top 2 divisions and a club was forcefully relegated to make room. The natural order has meaning in football.

I bang on about possession but its not tbad to have the ball, its how its used. Typically teams that use possession well, wont mess about at the back (unless the game is already comfortably won), they get it in the opponents half quickly, and thats when the fancy play starts. The good teams of course usually have the right players for it as well.

Especially as our training ground played no part in our recent success, and the big money sales.

only first party debt. we also will be losing money during this season so new debt will build up.

0.6 points deduction per charge, all imposed in a single season only, no forced sale of club, no ban from the EPL. Wouldnt surprise me if the UEFA ban ends up being longer when its an EPL charge.

Its a joke, many of us knew it would be.

Cant find anything on youtube for this.

I feel nothing, no emotion, wanting new owners.

Yet we have a fair few who think the manager is just the problem.

AKCJ has beat me to it really, this is similar to the mens situation, it needs the ownership fixing first before the rest can be focused on.

You think a player joined us from an EPL club to be paid a pittance, its clear we still giving out lucrative contracts. Glad we agree on Seagrave. I also think Seagrave will likely hinder a sale unless there is plans by the new owner to borrow against it to offset purchase cost.

No, the ownership is many magnitudes more important than the manager and football results at the moment. If anything the shambolic manager is doing well to distract from Top with his poor results being a talking point.

I think the youth are, the signings seem to be poor though. They not good enough if they trying to emulate man city whilst in league one. They good enough if we play to maximise every player.

I seen in the clip we had nearly 30k attendance for that game? Are that many really still going?

I do agree with you. I think the question of should they punished for breaking the rules, and the question should the rules even exist are two separate ones. I agree with you 100%, that PSR/FFP is all about making sure only the established clubs can spend big money, they want a in built advantage, and got stroppy when other teams started competing with them financially. I hope that clarifies my position. Also agree that the club is obviously well run in the football area, if you useless in this area, you can still fail whilst spending huge sums.