Sly

Here we go …..

Depends on the terms. 156 weeks (3 years) x £40k - Total £6,000,000 52 weeks (1 year) x £90k - £4,680,000 We also spread the costs.

Sorry! Yes.

I guess we’re waiting on answers from Vardy, Ndidi and Vestergaard, who in turn are waiting to see what they can get elsewhere. We know Praet, Albrighton and Iheanacho have gone. No idea on Luke Thomas. The U23s have been told, as some have already gone.

So in the past two weeks, the favourite has been…. Potter - who’d rather have the England job. Corberan - who is going to cost of over £4m. Moyes - On the basis he’s out of a job. Van Nistelrooy - As he played similar football and is unemployed. Now Potter! The media has no idea. I can still see a Garcia / Still combination.

Assuming this is a dig at James “I can’t believe he’s left them” Maddison?

When fit he’s great. But then again, so is a glass bottle until it’s broken.

Mahrez, Kante, Hirst, Tielemans, and Perez have done okay. Ovviously the first two have won a lot more trophies. In fairness to Maguire, he’s got a League Cup and FA Cup, which is more than our ex player Harry Kane.

Can you imagine either Starmer or Sunak having to have a debate with Trump? Utter chaos.

We should have done a reverse naked attraction, where they stand in a box and if they talk out of turn, the screen drops! on seconds thoughts ….

You could say that about a lot of practical subjects. When I left school in 1999, I had no idea about mortgage, pension, politics how to be an adult etc It’s all good though, as I know loads about classical literature, the date for the Punic wars, trigonometry and can play a tune on a triangle.

Right, this was great wasn’t it. Can’t wait for the next one!!

Starmer actually sounded semi normal answering about the football. Sunak tried to come across as billy big bollocks.

Whilst I agree with you, we are unfortunately in the minority.

Unfortunately only about 5% of us will read the manifesto. If Starmer or Sunak said I’m turning around all boats around and sending them back to France in this debate, Fred who goes down the pub every night likes the sound of this and votes for him. He doesn’t care that he’ll no longer be able to afford his beer, because the party is also re-introducing window tax.

It’s comical to be honest. Sunak just interrupts and Starmer is letting him dig his own hole. Neither are great. We are basically voting for the least worse.

So far I’ve taken. Starmers mum and wife worked in the NHS. Sunaks dad was a GP. Starmer worked in prosecution. Neither have an answer on migration. Neither have an answer on taxes. This ref is not even championship standard.

I was just waiting for someone to ask about Jimmy Savile and why the case was dropped, whilst he head the CPS. Nick Clegg would wipe the floor with the pair of these.

This isn’t his stage. Starmer like you say isn’t comfortable. Sunak is like the angry parent of the bully at private school, defending it despicable child. Also, how many times are we going to hear “bold decision”!

I thought that, which surprised me.

Serious question, what is the answer on immigration? I don’t think anyone can answer that question.

Sunak is irritating her isn’t he

Slightly off topic, Paxman has stood down due to his Parkinson’s diagnosis hasn’t he?

Do we have an alternative to this pair?

Who won that half then?