Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Lionator

Member
  • Posts

    13,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Lionator

  1. Was just about to post that, it looks insane. A whole street just wiped out like that. Never seen anything like it in the uk before.
  2. The tracks look completely buckled in the distance, not much guessing as to what’s caused it.
  3. Lionator

    The Weather

    Matt LeTissier said it’s summer and it’s normal and we should all just get on with it. I’d rather believe him than the woke leftie met office blob who are trying to destroy our fun. 1976 was much worse than this and I just drank Newcy Brown to get through it.
  4. Train crash in Sussex near Eastbourne.
  5. A lot of people seem to be fancying Luton and Plymouth (who looked woeful v Exeter). There always seems to be a surprise package in this division though.
  6. The way the campaign has gone, him playing wouldn’t mean that a player that deserves their place would miss out. That number 3 slot which he’d take has been a complete mess for us.
  7. Good to see the Somalian referee barred from the US, refereeing the super cup!
  8. Would rather play Notts in a semi to be honest but yeah. Finishing top gives us a lot of rest before the semi though. Every other team will have played twice by the time we play again on Sunday. You’d like to think that’ll benefit us especially given the heat.
  9. So it looks like it’ll be Yorkshire v Notts/Surrey Lancashire v Durham Then Middlesex v winner of the Yorkshire game Us v winner of the Lancashire game
  10. No it was somewhere between 219 and 229. Lancashire had to win by 215 runs or more.
  11. Ah well, the dream was nice while it lasted. Can’t see us winning 3 consecutive games sadly.
  12. So if they get 200 all out in 40 overs, the run rate would be 5, but they project it as if they’ve used the whole 50 overs, so it would actually be 4, if that makes sense? Unless they’re all out in less than 40 overs I don’t think it’ll make that much difference today.
  13. That was a tough pitch whereas this is a road.
  14. Somewhere between 219 and 229. Different calculations are saying different things. caveat if they’re all out, it’ll need to be more as it gets projected to 50 overs.
  15. You’d think Lammonby would be getting 230 himself on this deck.
  16. Surrey needed to win by 270. Notts need to knock it off in 28 overs
  17. Unless they get bowled out in less than 50 overs, which means it would be a bit more. I can’t see how they don’t get 231 on that pitch but you never know once panic sets in, you just know they’ll lose early wickets.
  18. Just stuck the stream on, they’re getting 420+ easily. Boundaries are incredibly short.
  19. Their bowling attack is pretty weak though, Bailey is decent but the rest not so much.
  20. Yep so if Surrey get 300 (underestimate), Notts would need to chase in within 32 overs to overtake us. Basically impossible. Any higher than 300 and that over number reduces. Can’t see Surrey winning by 290. Taunton is always a good batting deck and it’s hard to see Lancs getting past the 350+ they’d probably need to stand a chance. I’m confident we’ve done it.
  21. They’d need to win by 200+ to have any hope of overtaking us. Nice quiet starts all round which suit us. Hopefully it’ll be pretty clear we won’t be overtaken by 2pm and we can have a restful afternoon.
  22. Surrey batting first benefits us.
×
×
  • Create New...