Scotch

Just a "we understand the fans frustration" or something along those lines would be a start. Not an out right refusal to even consider explaining. But if they aren't going to say anything then fine but they can't say anything about the fans having their doubts ether then. Rudkin can't complain about journalists speculating. Enzo can't threaten to take his ball and go home if the fans don't back his ideas 100%. Either try and empathise with the fans doubts or put up with the speculation and anxiety that those doubts breed.

Like I said, a bit of empathy. Show that they understand the fan's frustration. Ensure that the club are doing everything they need to to secure a profitable future, convince us the club is in good hands. Just saying "I'm not talking about it" and that's it comes off as cold and doesn't provide any peace of mind and when you hear the club moaning about what certain journalists print or when Enzo is moaning about the fans energy post game... they can't expect anything more from us if they aren't doing anything to help the atmosphere around the club.

Enzo's comments on it are even more frustrating. I get it's not necessarily his place, he might even have been told NOT to but as a club, you can't hardline point blank refuse to say anything about something like this and not expect the fans to fear the worst, get frustrated and cause a sh!t atmosphere AND THEN b!tch about the fans not buying into the clubs vision and being negative when we have no idea what it is. I'm not asking for a public breakdown of our finances or how we operate in the transfer market but a bit of openness or even empathy towards the fanbase's anxiety surrounding our future would be nice.

Hopefully Inter agree to mutually terminate his contract today and we can just sign him on a free. That would be nice.

I was never really invested in this signing. No idea what it was, he was clearly talented but I just never got excited about it so I'm not to fussed about not getting him in specifically but it is worrying that we couldn't get SOMEONE in. We clearly wanted someone and although we can't know what's went on, there is clearly something that's off.

What's ACTUALLY happening is, we've heard rumours that our fans are planning on using the Shawn fvcking Michael's theme as his song and we've sacked it off because we could never recover from the sheer embarrassment of it.

The thought of the deafening silence of the KP on gameday being interrupted by a half-arsed rendition of Shawn Fvcking Michael's entrance music is just too much cringe for me to handle. I think I'd rather not sign him at all than see that.

If it's not "I believe in miracles, since you came along, you Sensi thing" then we never deserved to have him.

I'm not convinced anything will happen today.

I wouldn't be so sure. A typical 23 year old GK is still about 7 years away from his prime.. If he's this good at this age, clubs will be paying attention.

He really is having a great season tbf. Surely in the running for POTY.

Apparently they are keen on Butland at Rangers but would have to pay a decent amount. He only signed in the summer and is having an unbelievable season.

Has to be wages, surely.

Does a one-legged duck swim in circles?

Just call me Armstrong 'cuz I'm stretching!

Could be that Inter started dicking around trying to amend the deal last minute and whilst we were negotiating that, started sounding out alternatives and stumbled on something better.

These terms are agreeable.

Add to that, Nelson is starting to make a fair challenge for that RCB slot.

Does that make us their version of Torino?

Even if he does sign today, our past form tells us that we will still wait to announce it until probably somewhere in the next 3-4 YEARS!

It's funny, at the start of the season, he was the one player that I really didn't want to lose... Now? I'm very eager to see him go. 6 months on his contract, arguably 4th choice striker and would alleviate some of our reported financial worries. It's weirder when you consider that of all our strikers, he's the one that on paper fits what Enzo wants from our striker the most but it's just not worked out that way.

He seems to have dodgy ankles. In the last 6 seasons, he's missed 60 odd games with recurring ankle problems.

Why, in your own words, he has be "consistently poor" at times this season. Surely £30m would be great business.

Couple of months ago you were saying there are "plenty of players that should be playing ahead of him" and now the thought of us selling him for £30m means the board should go...

I've suspected that this could happen for a week or so now. It makes sense.