Foxmeister

Imagine if VK comes back next summer to find he’s on 1/8th of the wages he signed up for.

You will need to do it as late as you can, they change the qr code from time to time, we got caught out by this. It does work though.

I’ve been wondering the same thing.

I thought League 1 rules are based purely on payroll to turnover ratio. If that’s the case, isn’t this season a perfect opportunity to do what we’re doing and shift players out who cost big money? Could someone correct me on this because there’s still a lot of talk about amortisation?

Milk turns quicker, get him gone!

It’s just a horrible load of chummy bollocks. It feels like they’re saying the players are just ordinary lads who enjoy the same sort of music as you. They’re not, they don’t, it’s shit.

Yes, its wording would suggest that. It suggests a sort of intermediate level, maybe around the 75% mark. I doubt Leeds would be able to demonstrate they would have been promoted if we hadn’t broken the rules on that basis.

Beyond reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof applied in criminal cases. These cases are civil matters decided on the balance of probabilities.

The limitation period only starts from when the claimant becomes aware of the breach so, were they to be found guilty, it would be 3 years from the date of that judgment.

You could sensibly argue a legacy benefit though.

Oddschecker shows it, I haven’t seen the actual site though.

Betvictor

The 50/1 for us to go down looks very tempting now.

Down to 14 outfielders on our books, with a likely 6 more of those leaving, and that includes Golding.

There’s the famous story of Brian Clough fining Larry Lloyd a week’s wages for not wearing a tie in a boiling hot airport in Tokyo. Could you imagine that happening nowadays?