To be fair there are multiple points to consider for this.
1. It's great to see others take a lead/initiative on this sort of thing and as a group, we don't feel it's right to barge in and take over.
2. Following on from point 1, the leader(s) of this also wouldn't want groups to get too involved.
3. As a group, we want to make sure this has value which meant biding our time a little bit to see how it evolves.
Bottom line, I do think the group (or at least majority of members) will support this but not front and centre. We will be present to join in but not steal anyone's thunder. The closer we get, the more we will talk internally about any plans.