Viva

Whether he improves his form or not, it was a good sale for us at the time for the money we received. Far too many toys were thrown out the pram on here when we sold him.

I’d be surprised at that when he was available for free in the summer. However, if true I’d happily take £15m plus for him in the summer.

Nobody is paying £15m plus for him. Can’t see us selling him for less than that. I imagine he’ll be here next season whichever league we’re in, unless he throws his toys out the pram.

Yes he was.

So who plays right back if Justin got injured for the season?

We had one right back as I clearly stated earlier. We need two players in each position, so had to bring one in. Not hard to understand.

Who do you expect to get for a couple of million? Unlikely to be somebody to walk straight into the first team.

We have no other right back in the squad. Obviously signed as cover for both sides.

It's not that hard to understand! I was replying to a post Ric Flair made about several players we could have signed cheaply to improve our chances. Similarly to when he hyped up Tete, who turned out to be useless. You can't seriously be giving Tete any credit for one good performance out of 13?! Signing nobody is better than just signing anybody for the sake of it, especially when PSR is obviously tight. We made that mistake with Edouard.

Signing a player that Ric was really keen on that turned out to be crap!

Maybe they didn't want another Tete situation!

That’s not exactly what the letter states. It says they reviewed his version of events against the CCTV and remain satisfied that he was more than likely involved. At the very least, they say the group helped to conceal the person setting it off to an extent that it wasn’t clear which one actually did it.

They say that the person took positive action to assist the individual and the group acted together to conceal their identity. You can be found guilty of things in law even if you wasn’t the person that actually committed the final offence.

It’s not a cut and shut case. The letter shown on here doesn’t say they were banned for being close to where it happened. It says at the very least, they took positive action to assist the individual that did.

I try to bring a bit of balance to the never ending, relentless negativity about anything and everything on here. Not all bans given out would be unjustified.