NextPlease
Member-
Posts
79 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by NextPlease
-
Interesting you use the above in quotation marks, find and share the link to where the club stated this ? A journalist ran a report along those lines but there was never anything from the club to indicate this was the case.
-
50% would love to know how you worked out that figure ? 1st protest march highest figure claimed was 700, accept not every anti fan would make the effort but it’s a big leap to say 15,000 fans Might be 50% of Foxestalk active posters, but so many fans don’t visit & post on this message board
-
When comparing the 2 losses, we need to factor in: 1) Hsrdly any player sales within the £71m loss, but significant sales in the previous year and will be again when the 25/26 accounts come out 2) Player contract clauses, so the significant relegation wage reductions (maybe as high as 50%, based on the recent reports about Winks) in the 23/24 figures, with the reverse applying for 24/25
-
Totally disagree, we don’t put enough pressure on officials to gain an advantage for our team We have received at least one red this season because of opposition fans going mental about a challenge in their home ground
-
I agree that was the case As for today, I wasn’t sure if the “official organisers” whoever they are even planned for a protest - if they did they should communicate it isn’t happening today Or whether it was some random posters on here believing there would be one today & it was never planned at all
-
Given Top has stated he will rebuild this is certainly the more likely outcome
-
It’s wide spread practice across many clubs
-
I was one of the 7,000 at Filbert Street during the Pleat era, that was a far less filled stadium
-
ST Prices weren’t reduced last time we were relegated to League One, we aren’t down yet
-
I’ve heard an email was sent to members
-
Kevin Davies was already on the board listed at Companies House as Secretary, it has not been updated since appointed as CEO
-
Latest Fan Advisory Board (FAB) Meeting
NextPlease replied to jammie82uk's topic in Leicester City Forum
They shouldn't be, its been the longest delay between the meeting & publication since the FCC was re-formulated. The majority of FAB meeting minutes at other clubs are published within 3 - 4 weeks, Spurs managed within a few days on one occasion Ours have mainly been 4 - 5 weeks -
QPR Saturday 14th March 3pm (H) Protest - Unite for change
NextPlease replied to 1884HF's topic in Leicester City Forum
Agree with the 25 biggest clubs, but that could still mean we are in a Tier 2 play off position, but then “smaller” clubs can break the mould, as we have done against the “big 6” Any realist would acknowledge our PL win was achieved during a perfect storm where all the “top clubs” had an off year. Albeit fans of other clubs fail to remember our title win included a clear points gap to second place. We have had a bad season & hopefully won’t be relegated, if we stay in the division I don’t follow the doom thinking of an extended spell not competing for promotion to the PLfor a number of years. I didn’t believe at the beginning of the season that we would go back up this season & it did require a 2 - 3 season complete re build to create a new team that had a good chance of then staying in the PL once promoted -
QPR Saturday 14th March 3pm (H) Protest - Unite for change
NextPlease replied to 1884HF's topic in Leicester City Forum
I think those stating we have “returned to normal” would consider us more of a “yo yo” club switching between the top & second tier, So, yes position wise this is a poor season, but being in the 2nd tier isn’t unusual, so for instance we had a long spell in tier 2 prior to staying up in the “great escape” season. -
QPR Saturday 14th March 3pm (H) Protest - Unite for change
NextPlease replied to 1884HF's topic in Leicester City Forum
I don't think the bad cop part was needed, but those not believing in the Fan Engagement Framework won't agree with me, mainly because the changes took so long from first raised in FAB/FCC meetings -
QPR Saturday 14th March 3pm (H) Protest - Unite for change
NextPlease replied to 1884HF's topic in Leicester City Forum
That’s ironic being posted on here, when anybody speaking as not supporting the protest is labelled KPFC Totally agree with your post above, but it does apply to supporters of the protest too -
Perhaps its because many of the protestors weren't old enough to remember the Milan Mandaric era, but we have faced the prospect of League One before and suffered relegation, yet he didn't receive the level of criticism thrown at our current owners. At that time he swerved making transfers which could have kept us up in an era when PSR hadn't been invented but refused to do so. Our current owners are juggling trying to avoid further sanctions, yes they have made poor calls on players wages (every club has a hit & miss situation on transfer business and go through spells of getting many right and then getting many wrong), but unlike Everton & Forest fans, our fans have never been vocal about the unfairness of PSR (a few notable exceptions recently on here) or recognise we were the first to be hamstrung by the restrictions due to our success, but other clubs will follow overtime. Also, reporting has been misleading, how many have banged on about Winks being on £90k/week, to only now discover in reports this week he is on less than half of this ? My hope is the recent announced changes with the Sporting Director and Commercial Director, will bring the needed refresh in thinking, but they both need to be given time to have an impact, so that as a minimum would be one full season
-
Protest march vs Norwich - Sat 28th Feb 2026
NextPlease replied to Dan's topic in Leicester City Forum
So we know circa £20m of the £35m will come from the BEK obligation to buy, so means selling one other player ? That will happen, so no financial meltdown -
Each to their own.... Leicester City belongs to all of us
NextPlease replied to tickler28's topic in Leicester City Forum
For me this is post of the year Fans have wildly different views, each to their own, but don't abuse other fellow LCFC fans because they don't agree with your opinion -
Foxes Trust Survey on Fan Engagement Framework
NextPlease replied to Foxes_Trust's topic in Leicester City Forum
The idea of the survey is get each fans individual views, not to listen to the Foxestalk echo chamber -
Sorry to clarify the “you” wasn’t meaning yourself specifically but the “you” as in any poster who criticises other fans Not getting the service so not paying isn’t really what’s happening though is it, as many no shows are ST holders who have paid but aren’t showing up Suspect some renewed to keep their seats to watch Liverpool & Arsenal etc next season, as they did when previously relegated but we kept winning then so showed up under Enzo, but can’t be bothered now - so the club is only losing out on potential on the day purchases finance wise
-
Just posted on another thread, why do posters keep telling others what they should do? Each person can make their own mind up and if they come to a different conclusion to you, they are not wrong, they just have a different set of priorities
-
So if the decision is a financial one fair enough, but surely that applies regardless of how well the team are doing or not ? For some, going to the football is a top priority for others it isn’t, and over the years the level of priority changes for some due to circumstances However the problem with this message board is many posters will not accept that other fellow fans are different to their own circumstances and are therefore wrong. How about listening to others views and respecting them, not slagging them off because they don’t think & act like you
