NextPlease

Kevin Davies was already on the board listed at Companies House as Secretary, it has not been updated since appointed as CEO

They shouldn't be, its been the longest delay between the meeting & publication since the FCC was re-formulated. The majority of FAB meeting minutes at other clubs are published within 3 - 4 weeks, Spurs managed within a few days on one occasion Ours have mainly been 4 - 5 weeks

Agree with the 25 biggest clubs, but that could still mean we are in a Tier 2 play off position, but then “smaller” clubs can break the mould, as we have done against the “big 6” Any realist would acknowledge our PL win was achieved during a perfect storm where all the “top clubs” had an off year. Albeit fans of other clubs fail to remember our title win included a clear points gap to second place. We have had a bad season & hopefully won’t be relegated, if we stay in the division I don’t follow the doom thinking of an extended spell not competing for promotion to the PLfor a number of years. I didn’t believe at the beginning of the season that we would go back up this season & it did require a 2 - 3 season complete re build to create a new team that had a good chance of then staying in the PL once promoted

I think those stating we have “returned to normal” would consider us more of a “yo yo” club switching between the top & second tier, So, yes position wise this is a poor season, but being in the 2nd tier isn’t unusual, so for instance we had a long spell in tier 2 prior to staying up in the “great escape” season.

I don't think the bad cop part was needed, but those not believing in the Fan Engagement Framework won't agree with me, mainly because the changes took so long from first raised in FAB/FCC meetings

That’s ironic being posted on here, when anybody speaking as not supporting the protest is labelled KPFC Totally agree with your post above, but it does apply to supporters of the protest too

No, recorded on the Friday, then edited so was always going to published after the Norwich game Had the Thai royal family death not happened, then it would have been recorded in the UK a couple of weeks earlier

Perhaps its because many of the protestors weren't old enough to remember the Milan Mandaric era, but we have faced the prospect of League One before and suffered relegation, yet he didn't receive the level of criticism thrown at our current owners. At that time he swerved making transfers which could have kept us up in an era when PSR hadn't been invented but refused to do so. Our current owners are juggling trying to avoid further sanctions, yes they have made poor calls on players wages (every club has a hit & miss situation on transfer business and go through spells of getting many right and then getting many wrong), but unlike Everton & Forest fans, our fans have never been vocal about the unfairness of PSR (a few notable exceptions recently on here) or recognise we were the first to be hamstrung by the restrictions due to our success, but other clubs will follow overtime. Also, reporting has been misleading, how many have banged on about Winks being on £90k/week, to only now discover in reports this week he is on less than half of this ? My hope is the recent announced changes with the Sporting Director and Commercial Director, will bring the needed refresh in thinking, but they both need to be given time to have an impact, so that as a minimum would be one full season

Thailand interview was recorded before Norwich away Media interviews were planned before the Oxford game was played You know this, so stop suggesting a connection which isn’t true

So we know circa £20m of the £35m will come from the BEK obligation to buy, so means selling one other player ? That will happen, so no financial meltdown

For me this is post of the year Fans have wildly different views, each to their own, but don't abuse other fellow LCFC fans because they don't agree with your opinion

The idea of the survey is get each fans individual views, not to listen to the Foxestalk echo chamber

Sorry to clarify the “you” wasn’t meaning yourself specifically but the “you” as in any poster who criticises other fans Not getting the service so not paying isn’t really what’s happening though is it, as many no shows are ST holders who have paid but aren’t showing up Suspect some renewed to keep their seats to watch Liverpool & Arsenal etc next season, as they did when previously relegated but we kept winning then so showed up under Enzo, but can’t be bothered now - so the club is only losing out on potential on the day purchases finance wise

Just posted on another thread, why do posters keep telling others what they should do? Each person can make their own mind up and if they come to a different conclusion to you, they are not wrong, they just have a different set of priorities

So if the decision is a financial one fair enough, but surely that applies regardless of how well the team are doing or not ? For some, going to the football is a top priority for others it isn’t, and over the years the level of priority changes for some due to circumstances However the problem with this message board is many posters will not accept that other fellow fans are different to their own circumstances and are therefore wrong. How about listening to others views and respecting them, not slagging them off because they don’t think & act like you

With the PSR case about to start he was never going to talk about it at this point. Hope he does when the case is over but it would be a huge shift from the previous silence over many years

Totally agree Fans moan about players not being “up for the game” and “not committed” Do they ever consider their own attitude when turning up for a game. Each game is a new one, clean slate, , start with the belief we can win the next 90+ minutes. ”We” being the players, the fans and anyone associated with the club

As LoxM posted 14 hours ago.... But why on earth is the focus even on the statement... The whole reason there was a statement is because some fans were literally chanting about a bloke dying and being cut up from head to toe. Hows that somehow become the side issue? The conversation shouldn’t be about whether the clubs PR was dubious.. it should be about how grim those chants actually were. I dont even know who Graeme is or what he does, I’ve got no dog in this fight other than saying those chants were just grim. And all this “but” this, “but” that stuff just ends up feeling like a justification of the chanting. Rightly or Wrongly, yes i do think the chant about rudkin could meet a threshold of hate speech...I dont necessarily agree with that because I personally dont actually think there is a credible 'threat' to his life... but it could definitely be perceived that way by the authorities im sure.. Thats the point Graeme was making.

Get behind them from minute one.... Minute three... Rudkin Out Mixed messaging don't you think ?

or alternatively