With some things out of our control, and his, I'd be happy to stay up for the sake of it with any given method. The one thing it sounds like Cooper has going for him is the youth/youngster development. That bodes well when you think of some of the players coming through as you've mentioned.
I'm not expecting the world from Cooper and given the off-field shenanigans I think it'd be unfair for us to demand that. But if he gets us some scrappy wins and occasionally gets us to play some attractive football then so be it. If we're getting a lucky draw against a bigger side or a scrappy 1-0 win over a relegation rival, again I won't be too fussed that it didn't come along with football that's easy on the eye. I'd be happy to leave that til next season if we survive as a way to get some identity about it.
I imagine that from the rumours about why Potter didn't jump at the chance to manage us - wanting more control over transfers - it means that Cooper probably doesn't have much of a say. If that means Rudkin wields more control then I'd be worried. But that worry will be negated if we go back to our older recruitment model of buying young/cheap and selling for a big profit to re-invest in the squad. Difficult, but not impossible.
I'm all for wanting something to identify with too, but we're in such a difficult moment as a club right now I'd take a 'survival of all costs' approach. Maybe if we start the season well I'd be open to more of a 'Leicester identity' but we just need to survive to begin with.