ramboacdc

CNN throws it's first projections out. Kentucky - Trump Vermont - Harris Georgia, Indiana, South Carolina too close to call.

Bomb threats to polling stations in Georgia in Democrat areas. Wonder if the phone callers had Russian accents?

There is no smart money in betting. Doesn't mean anything more than some rich folks have put substancial bets on them. Bookies odds mean nothing. Don't make me go dig out the Preki thread as evidence.

Naff all. People have been putting large bets on Trump, but they know nothing.

Makes me think at this point he is just conceeding Pennsylvania.

The Rest is Politics livestream is rather good, but I know most people may not be Alastair Campbell or Rory Stewart fans. CNN making these weird exit polls where they don't tell you forecasts etc just stuff like "We asked what was the most important issue for you in this election? 34% said democracy and 31% the economy." Like a shit family fortunes...

It got pulled down overnight, but I bet it will be back up later. Got some ad ridden links that get me CNN ready either way. At one point last night I ended up with an IPTV setup that gave me 11,000 channels, none of what I needed haha. Anyway, stating on topic. The first results are a tie. Last time they were all Biden. Harris and Trump tie in Dixville Notch midnight vote to kick off Election Day https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/05/politics/dixville-notch-new-hampshire-2024-results

Found a CNN USA stream on Twitch. Turns out that place isn't just full of CoD, diddlers and women in hot tubs....

I usually go for the CNN US stream. I used to have one of them Kodi subscriptions that got me loads of channels, but in 4 years the high seas of IPTV and Kodi seem to have got too rough for me to trust any of these random sites or discord channels thst appear if you Google them. Fox news makes me come out with a terrible case of vomiting, but I'll give it a shot.

Anyone got an IPTV/Kodi provider that does American channels that they can DM me over at all please? I don't mind the low resolution streams, but if an alternative is there I would like to look at it.

I don't believe these polls at all. They are all hedging and herding. The Iowa poll is a gold standard pollster and says Harris is up with independent women and women over 60. They will vote in droves and I bet Roe Vs Wade is one of the reasons for that. The last 2 elections, none of them predicted the Trump support and it came down to the wire. Someone will win it and it won't be close. In a perfect world, Kamala flips red states where Trump hasn't so far claimed fraud. He is already starting to claim fraud in Pennsylvania, which makes me think he isn't seeing favourable polls. The one thing I would love to see happen is Texas go blue and Cruz lose his Senate seat. They will cry foul over fraud on that one forever and a day. Not impossible but highly improbable. Iowa, and Kansas may come back into play. If Harris wins Nevada, Michigan, Wisconsin along with flipping Iowa and Kansas and Trump takes all the battlegrounds, we get 269-269 and then it's a right shitshow and probably a 26-25 to Trump if it follows party lines and the dems get the 2 independents on their side. Trump will win all the sun belt states and PA, or he will lose by a large amount and all pollsters just didn't dare stray just in case. He will win Georgia or it won't be declared for a while because of the election officials previous refusing to declare the results because it didn't go Republican. The rest I think is all to play for.

Welp!

Is it still throwing it down?

That was in the championship wasn't it?

If it isn't acknowledged within 28 days, what is the next step?

Can you actually have a 6 pointer this early in the season?

It's not just them "sleuths" who were jumping on the Jay thing or the woman who went missing in the river a few years ago. They will jump on anything they can go keep the videos and clicks coming, that's just how this shitty social media world works and there is enough people who will make it and morons who will watch it and follow them. If I hear the words "true crime documentary" or "True Crime Podcast" one more time I may put my head through a microwave. This case has has David Davis, medical professionals and some statiticians saying that there is holes and inconsitencies. They could still take it higher than our Court of Appeal if they find something. It isn't over until it goes all the way up to the Supreme Court then into the European courts. I think she was involved for sure, but the doubts over if she got given a fair defence will be something that could end up at retrials for sure. I don't think it's a conspiracy. It's not like it's being done to cover someone or something else and she is the scapegoat or whatever. This inquiry will show what we all know, the NHS can't keep up with itself at this point and there is too many people involved in higher up roles that stuff gets lost. If a doctor or nurse raises a concern to their superior, there is a good chance it won't even make it to a consultant's desk or someone above them who has no medical experience and it's just white noise to them. EDIT: I just read the rest of the thread. I'll grab my tin foil hat and my flack jacket and sit in the corner....

There's more at Wembley for sure. Taylor Swift has the record at 8 gigs at wembley on the same tour, they will aim to beat that for certain

Mine was set up on Desktop. I have always got emails or notifiations before. I will keep an eye on it and see if I start getting any over the next few months.

Someone just pointed out to me we moved our FY end date in April 2023 to June 30th 2023, probably knowing this was coming and could help. We don't know when the FY end was set for the 23/24 yet do we? We only have the 22/23 accounts I believe?

Charges are unrelated but judgements like this blow holes in things apart from just what you are facing. Their legal teams will be reading through this and finding anything they can use, even if it just kicks the can down the road a few more years.

If we broke it last year in The Championship, I think the point deductions are only added once you drop back into the EFL.

Short answer is "almost certainly not." I think the Premier League would have also said in their statement of which course of action they would pursue now if there was one.

For those who don't want to read a 22 page doc, here is GPT summarisation. I bet that FY rule gets changed soon: Summary: Leicester City Football Club (LCFC) successfully appealed against a decision by a Premier League Disciplinary Commission that found the club breached the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSRs) for the 2022/2023 season. The Appeal Board, consisting of three senior legal figures, overturned the Commission's decision on the basis that LCFC was not bound by the relevant Premier League rules after its relegation to the English Football League (EFL) on 13 June 2023. Key Points: Background of the Case: The Premier League accused LCFC of breaching the PSRs due to losses exceeding the upper loss threshold of £105 million for the 2022/2023 season. LCFC contested the jurisdiction of the Commission to rule on the matter after the club's relegation from the Premier League. Jurisdictional Challenge: LCFC argued that it was no longer bound by the Premier League rules after its relegation on 13 June 2023. The Appeal Board agreed with LCFC, emphasizing that liability under the PSRs could only be assessed after the completion of the club's financial year, which ended on 30 June 2023—after the club had left the Premier League. Commission’s Original Decision: The Disciplinary Commission had ruled that LCFC remained bound by the Premier League rules for the 2022/2023 season, even after relegation, to ensure fairness and prevent clubs from avoiding penalties by being relegated. Appeal Board’s Decision: The Appeal Board found that the Premier League’s rules did not apply to LCFC after its relegation. The PSR Calculation for FY23 could only be performed after the end of the club’s financial year (30 June 2023), by which time LCFC was no longer a Premier League member. The Board concluded that LCFC did not breach Rule E.49 of the PSRs as it was not a "Club" under the Premier League rules at the time the breach could have occurred. Importance of the Accounting Reference Date: The Appeal Board noted that LCFC’s decision to change its accounting reference date to 30 June 2023 was critical. This decision, albeit coincidental, meant the club's PSR Calculation fell after its relegation, thus placing it outside the Premier League’s jurisdiction. Final Outcome: The Appeal Board reversed the Disciplinary Commission's finding of jurisdiction, concluding that LCFC was not in breach of the PSRs as the rules did not apply to them post-relegation.