ramboacdc

What's Vardys goal tally at now? Google gives you 3 different numbers

I am shite with money, so I bet I am wrong, but doesn't this just mean we now owe Top £420m? He would want that back if he sold up with his own interest for sure.

Do we think Ruud will got at 7pm or 8pm on Sunday then lads?

They did. I can't remember much after Top's lap with that bloke holding a picture of the king up though. I do remember there was a lot more people in SK1 I had never seen before who I was willing to bet were mates of Top and Vichai's. The sale of them tickets was an absolute shit show.

Not a chance of an amendment in the constitution. They don't have 66% of congress

How does it work if he is basically on hunger strike like he claims? Do they have to keep him alive? I thought force-feeding was illegal after The Troubles?

Goodie. Go past deadline day, say you ain't been backed and walk, bring in another toothless manager and prepare for Championship football.

I really hope this was drunk.... Drunk Kid? Kid. If that isn't why you go under Skidmark, what's the story there.

Stole the idea from Reddit. I suspect there are some interesting stories here. Starting it off, I once took a shortcut through a building site to get home, hopped the fence, bailed it over the top and went face first into the side of a skip.

Come on @Ric Flair, DM me the first and unbroadcastable draft of that poem please? 🤣

@Union FS were advocating for this very early on, if not before the start of the season. It is good to see they are always ahead of the curve!

Clubs are being pushed by the PL to get ready for going full digital tickets. I doubt there will even be the £25 offer soon enough.

Unless they got a big bulk order in for them from a more legit source, my bet is it's one of them ones from Temu. If you order it now, it may make it here for the Arsenal game

What was the complaint?

It was for sure.

Good to see the Facebook groups represented on this board finally with their utter nonsense. Should we all be grateful too as we won the prem 9 years ago too and not complain about anything ever again?

It's possible they could do it. If they did, hats off to them. It's a tough league and Chris Wood right now is fantastic. Will be tough to beat this Liverpool team over 38 games though.

If you could edit your post to remove the quote with the link in I would be grateful, but if you can't don't sweat it. My own fault for not looking before I leap I suppose.

Do it again but request a new link from them directly mate. I am not 10000% sure the link I put isn't specific to me, so to avoid risk of both our votes being discounted, email [email protected] . She may also be able to confirm your membership number at the same time.

I think your membership number is on the certificate they post out. I lost mine ages ago. EDIT: I was wrong on my statement about this. My link has since expired after I have voted. It is done by allocating a cookie to your browser though, so very simple to either open the link in a new browser, at which point you get a fresh voting page, or delete the cookie by clearing your browser cache. Easily manipulated, but at least there is an extra step needed to do so.

"Alan has voted 5 times, which I find interesting?"

I posted the link to the survey here believing you could vote multiple times and it was a generic link. I was wrong on this. Edited to correct this.

I joined online so wasn't sure of numbers in the room, but my takeaway points are: The push last year nearly doubled the size of the trust from ~300 to over 600. A lot are in the 21+ region. The drive to get more people signed up, with the hope of getting thousands of members, seemed to be non existent. At one point talking about how they need a TikTok account to draw in under 21s. If that doesn't show how out of touch they are I don't know what will. No discussion of using the £46k in the bank to do any sort of promotion on socials or anywhere else as a recruitment drive for the trust, but they want to increase membership. There were times where any sort of feedback around the trust was taken almost personally by the board member addressing the question. Asked why the trust still wants to sit on the FAB despite not liking the parameters set by the club the answer was "if we leave, we risk alienating the club and we wont get anything from them. We are not a protest group." Later on they spoke about how they contact the club for responses and hear nothing, so it's a moot point as naff all already comes back to the trust in the first place. The new treasurer seems pretty switched on. Like the above poster said, I couldn't give 2 tosses about stamps, but we had to be told how we buy them to post newsletters. Could easily save money on postage by not sending pointless certificates out to new members. On the presentation from the chair, one of the challenges listed was "Foxes Trust Reform" and then they glossed over it. This was because a few people had already ruffled their feathers around the FAB stuff and they didn't want to hear anything more against them. The website may be getting updated and a new members area made. It would need major overhaul and as it stands the members areas would be devoid of any information apart from name, contact details and member number. There isn't anything they could add to a resource hub or anything like that, so it feels as useful as a chocolate teapot. When it came to the motion, they were very dismissive, Simon held his own and was very good at responding to questions. I will be voting for it, but I do believe the finer details need adding to it. The board asked the audience questions of "what would you do?" and "say if I was on a multi year project and didn't come up with results in a year, are you voting me out?" to which the answer is no, but they span it to make it seem like people will call a confidence vote at a whim throughout the year, which is impossible as there have been no SGM's or EGM's this year and the board avoid them where they can claiming "resource issues." A lot of heart strings were being pulled saying they are volunteers who are "only human" and have to take time away some time (Lynn mentioning her recent bereavement and Matt saying he had issues in the past year that made him unable to perform to what he believes is an adequate level). In Matts case he was aware of this and offered his resignation, but it was declined and he did little for that period. He said "would you be voting me out as I couldn't perform?" No response was allowed and the meeting wrapped. But as someone wrote in the chat Matt did everything correct there and the Board decided to leave someone on the board they knew couldn't perform and didn't offer a temporary replacement, say who took over his duties or even tell the members. The whole time through this debate, Alan sat doing his best impression of the Churchill dog. He knows the way the votes are going, so much so he told us the votes were interesting on email, and then they changed the amount needed to pass from 67% to 75% and all proxy votes discarded. So now they have a rough poll and it feels the goalposts have been shifted hoping the older parts of the fan base see the reformists as some sort of trouble makers and it shuts Simon and his proposition down. It would take 10 of our switched on fans to make an officially recognised fan trust of twice the size in 6 months for sure. The whole thing is lame duck until dead wood is cleared. It's all jobs for the boys, possible perks for staying on the club sides (I can't prove that) and annual meetings where naff all is agreed apart from the notes from last year and the price of stamps.

PM'd it you mate

https://www.lcfc.com/pages/en/media-article/a-message-from-the-birch "After being taken ill at the weekend, LCFC Ambassador Alan Birchenall will miss the Club’s home matches this week. Birch was admitted to hospital on Sunday, but he would like to let well-wishers know that he is doing well and hopes to be back in circulation soon. Everyone at LCFC sends their love and best wishes to Birch during his recovery."