Guest Posted 1 May 2015 Posted 1 May 2015 Its so cruel how these highly paid athletes are forced to play 3 times a week. And train in the summer.
benpicko Posted 1 May 2015 Posted 1 May 2015 He's been offered a new contract. Yes he's been offered a 'fair' new contract that I don't see him likely to accept if he's getting offers from elsewhere and continues to not even make the bench, that's what I was saying
BigMicky Posted 1 May 2015 Posted 1 May 2015 Its so cruel how these highly paid athletes are forced to play 3 times a week. How does money relate to exertion on the body? What relevance is there?
Simo86 Posted 1 May 2015 Posted 1 May 2015 He's been offered a new contract. For us to be entitled to any compensation should he leave on a free we have to offer him a contract, so it could just be this reason. Not sure if we'd get compo where ever he went or just if he went to another English based team
Gerard Posted 1 May 2015 Posted 1 May 2015 Its so cruel how these highly paid athletes are forced to play 3 times a week. They could play every day quite easily. It's the intensity that suffers if you expect their performance levels to be as high.
Kitchandro Posted 1 May 2015 Posted 1 May 2015 They could play every day quite easily. It's the intensity that suffers if you expect their performance levels to be as high. Good job they're only playing 3 times in a week then and not every day.
benpicko Posted 1 May 2015 Posted 1 May 2015 Good job they're only playing 3 times in a week then and not every day. So you'd genuinely expect another performance of the same intensity if he kept the same team tomorrow?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.