Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Fuchs or Chilwell?  

150 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should be our starting Left Back?



Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, kingfox said:

That's basically why Chilwell is best suited to a wingers role.

If Not FB,then Wingback yes,but never winger

Fuchs >< Chilwell...We have 2 good players,we have a highly paid Manager....

I am willing to sit Back,enjoy the selection,yes enjoy..!!! The selections Mr Puel,

makes across the field...

IMO,too many posters over analyse and Go really OTT,with their indepth detailed opinions

and dynamic on player selection,from the Squad.

Our Squad,is who we are...Not more Not less. 

TheManager/Coaches get paid a fair sum,

With their Reputations on the Block,to come Up with trying varying permatations,

to win the Individual,or group of Games...

I have No interest to compare,or get on players backs.Once they Go over the whitewash,

I Support them,I stay a Fan.

I'll give young players a full involved season,too all I'll give Space and time,for Long Time injury,

Form loss,and adjustment.  So I dont hack-off the Individuals ,or go on campaigns,or crusades

for or against any, during the season. 

Individual Game promise, or Slip ups, will create knee-jerk  responses,fair enough,and deserves

Its post Match banter,but not more.

 

EO season then,lets see how we,they, then have Panned  Out.  Told-you-so know-all approach,

Usually one missed the Points of the season,caught up in ones own desperation,

that  prove only irrelevance.

Why should,we get on our high horse,when we have a Variant of choices,old and Young.

Puel Holding 8th, or finishing top 10 ,Shows hes doing a good Job IMO.

Prefer His approach, to the half cocked opinions in this Forum...

 

 

Edited by fuchsntf
Guest Col city fan
Posted

Where is the 'neither' option?

Fuchs is past his best (but has been a brilliant signing for this club) and Chilwell isn't yet the real gravy. He might be in time.

We need to be signing quality full backs in the summer imo. Both sides. This, for me, is our main priority.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

Where is the 'neither' option?

Fuchs is past his best (but has been a brilliant signing for this club) and Chilwell isn't yet the real gravy. He might be in time.

We need to be signing quality full backs in the summer imo. Both sides. This, for me, is our main priority.

I agree but maybe for Chilwell to step up he's gonna need to be starting games - painful as that may be for a bit...

Guest Col city fan
Posted
1 minute ago, Swan Lesta said:

I agree but maybe for Chilwell to step up he's gonna need to be starting games - painful as that may be for a bit...

Stop agreeing, you're making me feel quite Tom and Dick!

:P

 

Posted
3 hours ago, NotTheMarketLeader said:

Except there is no end product.

Use your brain mate.

 

Chilwell struggles defensively therefore what's the point in having him at left-back?

 

Chilwell can get forward extremely well, end product isn't great but we've had many wingers who have been similar.

Posted
25 minutes ago, kingfox said:

Use your brain mate.

 

Chilwell struggles defensively therefore what's the point in having him at left-back?

 

Chilwell can get forward extremely well, end product isn't great but we've had many wingers who have been similar.

Use your brain.

 

If there is no end product don’t pick the ****er ??‍♂️

Posted
2 hours ago, NotTheMarketLeader said:

Use your brain.

 

If there is no end product don’t pick the ****er ??‍♂️

We use to pick Schlupp and we'll continue to pick Chilwell regardless if he has a brain the size of a pea.

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...