Scow Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Pressman Makin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Scowcroft Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Wilcox, Gemmill, Stewart, Blake, Wright ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tiatto is fit so I can imagine him coming in at Left back with Stewart dropping to the bench. We'll probably have 3 strikers on the bench again because Nathan Blake will be in there somewhere...... <_<
Ash Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Scowcroft Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Wilcox, Gemmill, Stewart, Blake, Wright ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tiatto is fit so I can imagine him coming in at Left back with Stewart dropping to the bench. We'll probably have 3 strikers on the bench again because Nathan Blake will be in there somewhere...... <_< 18850[/snapback] Yer id say the same apart from Wright out Benjamin in <_<
SilverFox Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Scowcroft Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Wilcox, Gemmill, Stewart, Blake, Wright ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tiatto is fit so I can imagine him coming in at Left back with Stewart dropping to the bench. We'll probably have 3 strikers on the bench again because Nathan Blake will be in there somewhere...... <_< 18850[/snapback] I'd agree with that, but I haven't seen Wilcox, Stewart or Blake even justify a place on the bench yet. I'd probably have Gudjonnson on there(I know...not much better), then stick in Stearman and Dawson...never happen though!
Mark Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Pressman Makin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Stewart Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Scowcroft, Gemmill, Heath, Dawson, Wright
Guest freund Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Stewart Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Scowcroft, Gemmill, Heath, Dawson, Wright 18861[/snapback] Is that what you want or think it will be?
Mark Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Stewart Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Scowcroft, Gemmill, Heath, Dawson, Wright 18861[/snapback] Is that what you want or think it will be? 18862[/snapback] Its what i want and what i would pick
Anish Posted 13 September 2004 Posted 13 September 2004 Scowy I think you're probably spot on with the first team. I'd like to see at least some sort of defensive cover on the bench though - Heath or Canero maybe. And get rid of Blake too, MA must have realised by far that Blake is just freeloading here.
dan_84 Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 pressman makin keown dabizas tiato harper nalis williams scowcroft dublin connely subs wright stewart benjamin gemmil stearman
Craig Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 Marks obviously been drinking too much dr pepper if he thinks stewart should be in the starting line up.
Cat Burger Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Scowcroft Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Wilcox, Gemmill, Stewart, Blake, Wright ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tiatto is fit so I can imagine him coming in at Left back with Stewart dropping to the bench. We'll probably have 3 strikers on the bench again because Nathan Blake will be in there somewhere...... <_< 18850[/snapback] Is that really justification for him to be in the starting line up?
Scow Posted 14 September 2004 Author Posted 14 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Scowcroft Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Wilcox, Gemmill, Stewart, Blake, Wright ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tiatto is fit so I can imagine him coming in at Left back with Stewart dropping to the bench. We'll probably have 3 strikers on the bench again because Nathan Blake will be in there somewhere...... <_< 18850[/snapback] Is that really justification for him to be in the starting line up? 18934[/snapback] Grow up.
bluefox Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 Pressman Makin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Canero/Williams/Nalis/Harper Connolly/Dublin Subs Scowcroft/Wright/Stearman/Stewart/Logan
Mad Dog Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 Scowcroft's picked the team exactly and Petrescu's spot on with what the team should be.
Teeno Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Stewart Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Scowcroft, Gemmill, Heath, Dawson, Wright 18861[/snapback] You obviously haven't been watching City recently then if you think Stewart justify's a starting place. I think you should put your hatred for Scowy aside and admit that he is ten times better than a lot of the other players we have especailly Stewart.
Mark Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Stewart Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Scowcroft, Gemmill, Heath, Dawson, Wright 18861[/snapback] You obviously haven't been watching City recently then if you think Stewart justify's a starting place. I think you should put your hatred for Scowy aside and admit that he is ten times better than a lot of the other players we have especailly Stewart. 18969[/snapback] Tiatto and Stewart would be better than Tiatto and Scowcroft. Its obvious. Plus the two can cover each other if one goes forward - other can defend. It makes perfect sense.
Eastern Fox Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 I would pick: Pressman Makin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Dawson/Nalis/Connolly Dublin/Wright ------------------------------------- Subs: Logan, Stewart, Heath, Williams, Slowcroft Lots of pace on the wings for once! I reckon Connelly would be better on the wing - that where he played mostly last season. Nalis and Williams are too similiar, so I would Dawson in the middle (for his tenacity and his tackling) with Nalis.
Mark Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 I would pick:Pressman Makin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Dawson/Nalis/Connolly Dublin/Wright ------------------------------------- Subs: Logan, Stewart, Heath, Williams, Slowcroft Lots of pace on the wings for once! I reckon Connelly would be better on the wing - that where he played mostly last season. Nalis and Williams are too similiar, so I would Dawson in the middle (for his tenacity and his tackling) with Nalis. 18982[/snapback] Looks good to me! Very good infact
RoyFox Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Stewart Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Scowcroft, Gemmill, Heath, Dawson, Wright 18861[/snapback] You obviously haven't been watching City recently then if you think Stewart justify's a starting place. I think you should put your hatred for Scowy aside and admit that he is ten times better than a lot of the other players we have especailly Stewart. 18969[/snapback] Tiatto and Stewart would be better than Tiatto and Scowcroft. Its obvious. Plus the two can cover each other if one goes forward - other can defend. It makes perfect sense. 18975[/snapback] Stewart your chatting tosh again and again and again. Get it into your skull - HE IS SHITE!!! Scowy is miles better 1. He can pass 2. He isn't a headless chicken 3. He dosn't give the ball away 4. He can score Have you watched Stewart play - Pace with 0 composure. Get REAL child boy!
Eastern Fox Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 PressmanMakin/Keown/Dabizas/Tiatto Harper/Williams/Nalis/Stewart Dublin/Connolly ------------------------------------- Subs: Scowcroft, Gemmill, Heath, Dawson, Wright 18861[/snapback] You obviously haven't been watching City recently then if you think Stewart justify's a starting place. I think you should put your hatred for Scowy aside and admit that he is ten times better than a lot of the other players we have especailly Stewart. 18969[/snapback] Tiatto and Stewart would be better than Tiatto and Scowcroft. Its obvious. Plus the two can cover each other if one goes forward - other can defend. It makes perfect sense. 18975[/snapback] Stewart your chatting tosh again and again and again. Get it into your skull - HE IS SHITE!!! Scowy is miles better 1. He can pass 2. He isn't a headless chicken 3. He dosn't give the ball away 4. He can score Have you watched Stewart play - Pace with 0 composure. Get REAL child boy! 18989[/snapback] Are you joking? He can't make or receive passes well. Also can't run, can't stay in one position (a 'headless chicken') and isn't exactly a prolific goalscorer.
Ash Posted 14 September 2004 Posted 14 September 2004 Stewart played good tonight , When we was 3-0 up he became very confident and started to take players on with ease but as soon as they scored 1 then he went back to his normal mode !
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.