Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If we got him for 6 months we would have paid him c. 7.2M over that time.

 

Not terrible for a player of that quality. Still don't believe we would have paid all that though. More likely a percentage of his wages and no fee was initially agreed then they upped the price and both Leicester and spurs pulled out.

Posted
1 hour ago, shen said:

What was wrong with his attitude? Of all things to aim at Eriksen, the attitude has to be the last thing. Even at Inter he's been thoroughly professional and chomped at the bit. He's been learning Italian and has recently conducted the first interview in Italian as well. Doesn't sound like someone who doesn't commit, even when the going gets tough.

 

So you've not followed recent developments of him actually playing and earning praise from Conte?

Glad to hear it. Still not worth that kind of money to the club. Maybe it's a credit to him that he was willing to fight for a place vs leaving. Just hate to see us start to attract players a bit past it and great in name only. Too much to lose at those type of numbers. A years pay for 2 of our best players.

Posted
2 hours ago, moore_94 said:

Say we got him on loan on deadline day, loan contracts are usually until the end of June, which would be 22 weeks, £6.6million to pay all his wages for that period

 

A deal to pay £3.3m loan fee and 50% of his wages doesn't look as bad in the first instance as compared to paying £300k a week

 

 

I think this would have been more likely the deal we would have looked for but it sounds like Inter may have wanted the loan fee plus 100% wages paid which we just wouldnt pay. 

Posted
2 hours ago, TJB-fox said:

We may have come to a wage agreement, that doesn’t translate to ‘we’ll pay all his wages’ 

Doubt we would have agreed all of his chunky salary. Sounds like we came to a agreement eg 30% of his wages but then they wanted however much on top for themselves.


 

I wonder if it meant that he agreed to come for half his wages and we agreed to that... or something along those lines..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...