Robsdee Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Reported in The Sun (so must be true!!) that Trev has gone on loan to Rotherham for 1 month. WTF is MA playing at?????
Ricey Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 We don't need him, besides this might give Tommy more of a chance............doubt it though because Blake is still here <_<
Birdy Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 A bit baffling, but it is only for a month afterall.
lumberjack Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 trevor is our leader... trevor is our leader
SilverFox Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Reported in The Sun (so must be true!!) that Trev has gone on loan to Rotherham for 1 month. WTF is MA playing at????? 21125[/snapback] Are you on crack?!?!? Benjamin is awful! :w00t:
Cobbo Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Reported in The Sun (so must be true!!) that Trev has gone on loan to Rotherham for 1 month. WTF is MA playing at????? 21125[/snapback] Are you on crack?!?!? Benjamin is awful! :w00t: 21130[/snapback] Better option to Blake though.....and Dublin at the mo!
davieG Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 He's only here because he's on £18k / week until the end of the season. As for the month well that can be renewed in the same way we have done with Harper. Plus we are probably getting a few quid/week, well maybe £2 for him while he's on loan. Best tactic MA's has carried out all season.
SilverFox Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Reported in The Sun (so must be true!!) that Trev has gone on loan to Rotherham for 1 month. WTF is MA playing at????? 21125[/snapback] Are you on crack?!?!? Benjamin is awful! :w00t: 21130[/snapback] Better option to Blake though.....and Dublin at the mo! 21131[/snapback] As much as I don't think we have seen much to shout about with regard to Dublin, he is still a mile better than benjamin. I agree on the Blake point you made though...my solution is get rid of both...they are both terrible! Give Wright a go...A spell on the bench might convince Dublin to pull his finger out and start playing like he wants to wear a city shirt!
bluefox Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 If this is true then he may get a few games (and goals) under his belt and come back full of confidence, looking to push Blake down the list. On the mean time I would like to see Tommy Wright given the start place with Connolly with Dublin on the bench. As for Blake....Put him in the reserves for a few matches and if he still can't run then send him for a long walk down to the dole office. He is the worst forward i have seen at LCFC for a very long time.
Guest Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 If some of the other players had the same passion and commitment as Benji, we would be a much better side.
Foxing_Around Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 If some of the other players had the same passion and commitment as Benji, we would be a much better side. 21135[/snapback] Yes but all the passion and commitment in the world doesn't make up for Benji's complete lack of footballing skill.
Durnerz Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 He's scored regularly in pre-season, got 9 goals last time we were in this division and has scored the winner at derby this season ,what more can he do? Don't forget,this isnt the premiership, I mean Danny Dichio is scoring regularly FFS.
Cobbo Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 well, according to TeamTalk the deal is dead! So we still have Trev for now!
Mark Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 What the hell is Micky doing? It says we are not prepared to let him go till after Christmas? Eh??? Looking at recent games he's behind Blake and Wright so what are we keeping him for? If he went for a month then maybe Rotherham would want to extend it whcih would save us a few pennys at least. Cant be doing with these pathetic decisions. Its simple, let him go, why discuss it and then tell them it aint happening till after Christmas?? I cant understand it. Adams out.
bluefox Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Rotherham can have Blake - Go on, take him! 21159[/snapback] Not going to happen though!! MA will play Blake come what may as he signed him and won't admit that he got this one very very wrong
Ash Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Im glad Trevor has gone , come on lets be honest he's a shocker
Mark Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Im glad Trevor has gone , come on lets be honest he's a shocker 21174[/snapback] He hasnt gone yet
Cobbo Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Im glad Trevor has gone , come on lets be honest he's a shocker 21174[/snapback] He's still here Ash Read the thread
Oli Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 He aint gone though. And he is a shocker. I like him because he is funny just his style of play.
Scow Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Rotherham can have Blake - Go on, take him! 21159[/snapback] Not going to happen though!! MA will play Blake come what may as he signed him and won't admit that he got this one very very wrong 21172[/snapback] I know. I think Moore is too much of a good manager to take on Blake anyway, despite how poor they're doing at the minute. It's only Micky who see's anything in him.
Ash Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 Wether Trev is a Leicester player or a Rotherham Player , he's still a shocker
TrickyTrev Posted 23 September 2004 Posted 23 September 2004 probably sensible considering his wage, but he is MUCH better than Nathan Blake and must be fuming that he has been dropped below him in the pecking order.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.