Ric Flair Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Logan Kenton Kisnorbo © McAuley Nisse Sylla Stearman Wesolowski Welsh Hume Elvis Subs: Porter, Tiatto, O'Grady, Henderson, Maybury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Lass Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Logan Kenton Kisnorbo © McAuley Nisse Sylla Stearman Wesolowski Welsh Hume Elvis Subs: Porter, Tiatto, O'Grady, Henderson, Maybury I'd agree with that And no Low in the 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertine Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 And no Low in the 16 Hallelujah! Can't see it though. I'd have to go with that team too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Ditto. Good team with the options available. Can't see Low being dropped from the 16, though, especially with our midfield, in terms of options available, about as deep as a spit blob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holly Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Logan Kenton Kisnorbo © McAuley Nisse Sylla Stearman Wesolowski Welsh Hume Elvis Subs: Porter, Tiatto, O'Grady, Henderson, Maybury sylla not injured??? not sure i want him 2 play either wasnt enthraled by him on tues but otherwise i like it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester Lass Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 sylla not injured??? not sure i want him 2 play either wasnt enthraled by him on tues but otherwise i like it There's no-one else is there really? Unless you want Josh Low in his place that is :pinch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holly Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 There's no-one else is there really? Unless you want Josh Low in his place that is :pinch: i no he does things wrong but i quite like him!!! *waiting for the whats and are u mads* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 i no he does things wrong but i quite like him!!! *waiting for the whats and are u mads* What? Are you mad? Low needs a break, he needs to spend time on the sidelines, perhaps if he doesn't feature for a few games, he'll come back hungry and might actually be a bit more useful. Sylla should remain on the right - for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
escape2victory Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 -----------------Logan Stearman--McAuley--Kisnorob--Johansson Maybury--Wesolowski--Tiatto--Welsh -------------Hume----Hammond Subs: O'Grady, Henderson, Kenton, Sylla, Hughes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 I think the team for QPR will depend a lot on who is physically fit enough to play, let alone who is on the injured list. I don't really know about an XI without knowing who is fit and who isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holly Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 I think the team for QPR will depend a lot on who is physically fit enough to play, let alone who is on the injured list. I don't really know about an XI without knowing who is fit and who isn't. i would like stearman and weso in middle again but due to the fact the didnt stop on tues they may well be to tired so i agree with fez on the not knowing thing, but i think the first team that was written should be it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holly Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 What? Are you mad? Low needs a break, he needs to spend time on the sidelines, perhaps if he doesn't feature for a few games, he'll come back hungry and might actually be a bit more useful. Sylla should remain on the right - for now. cheeky git yeh maybe it will do him good to give him a break Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 i would like stearman and weso in middle again but due to the fact the didnt stop on tues they may well be to tired so i agree with fez on the not knowing thing, but i think the first team that was written should be it If they're both fit enough to play I'd love to see how they'd work out against a Championship side. They showed real potential as a pairing. Can't wait for this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 If they're both fit enough to play I'd love to see how they'd work out against a Championship side. They showed real potential as a pairing. Can't wait for this game. :chant: Me neither. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieWorthoYaggedMyWife Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Would you really leave out Henderson after his performance on Tuesday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Don Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Would you really leave out Henderson after his performance on Tuesday? Yes. He mad a couple of good saves but still didn't dominate his box. Looked shaky on crosses, and his distribution was awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milky Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 plus logan needs games in order to develop into the top goalkeeper he has the potential to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 26 October 2006 Author Share Posted 26 October 2006 Would you really leave out Henderson after his performance on Tuesday? Yes, simply because Logan in his 6 or 7 games he's played hasn't put a foot wrong and at hereford and at Birmingham he probably had an even better game than Henderson had on tuesday. Quite an achievement. Plus, Henderson's kicking is very inconsistent and he flaps at alot of crosses. Great back-up to have though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MBK Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 logan maybury (subbed by kenton) mcauley kisnorbo nisse welsh (rm) (subbed by sylla) stearman weso tiatto(lm) hume hammond might take the opportunity of injuries and give obdihambo a further taster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Yes, simply because Logan in his 6 or 7 games he's played hasn't put a foot wrong and at hereford and at Birmingham he probably had an even better game than Henderson had on tuesday. Quite an achievement. Plus, Henderson's kicking is very inconsistent and he flaps at alot of crosses. Great back-up to have though. Shame they're both out of contract in the summer. We need to fix that - Logan needs a contract giving to him, fast! Henderson I'm undecided on. If we could rid ourselves of Douglas, we should definitely extend Henderson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Job to know who's going to be available. Assuming these are possibles I'd like: Logan; Stearman, McAuley, Kisnorbo, Nils; Porter, Weso, Danny, Welsh; Hammond, Hume. Subs: Henderson, Kenton, Gradel, Hughes, O'Grady. I've left the back line untouched from recent League games because it has worked reasonably well. Porter's on the right because he passes the ball better, retains it better, can defend better and can genine support in midfield when necessary. Weso replaces Hughes because, if both are fit, I'd sooner have Weso - and Danny retains his place cos he'll be fresh and he did okay last time. I've put Gradel in the squad because he is a far more dangerous right winger than Low or Sylla and Porter could join Weso in midfield if the old un starts to feel the pace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 Weso replaces Hume because, if both are fit, I'd sooner have Weso and Danny retains his place cos he'll be fresh and he did okay last time. I'm lost. I assume you didn't mean Hume, but I can't work out who you actually meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 I'm lost. I assume you didn't mean Hume, but I can't work out who you actually meant. I meant Hughes, from last week. Hughes did alright against Palace but Weso's far better given the choice and having then to decide between Danny and Hughes I think Danny's harder, more dangerous in front of goal and can make some width too if he's ever inclined. Sorry to confuse you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhaticando Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 I meant Hughes, from last week. Hughes did alright against Palace but Weso's far better given the choice and having then to decide between Danny and Hughes I think Danny's harder, more dangerous in front of goal and can make some width too if he's ever inclined. Sorry to confuse you. Hughes must have completely fallen off my radar, because I never thought Hume and Hughes' name similarity. haha. First time they've ever been confused for one another, Thracian. (Hopefully the last!) Are you not tempted to give Stearman another whirl in the middle alongside Weso then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcfc_jme Posted 26 October 2006 Share Posted 26 October 2006 As close as injuries will allow to the team we had on Tuesday, probably putting Stearman out wide right to replace Sylla and so bringing Pirate Danny into the middle of the park alongside Weso Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.