Lovejoy Posted 17 September 2008 Posted 17 September 2008 I was thinking the same thing, Then it hit me we do have a problem the price of fooking beer. Dodgy off-licences are the answer to that my friend .
Manwell Pablo Posted 17 September 2008 Posted 17 September 2008 So, if you drink for taste, if there was no alcohol in the drinks, would you still drink them? Indeed, Alchoal is a aquired taste, aquried through the need to get drunk.
Fox You Forest Posted 17 September 2008 Posted 17 September 2008 Dodgy off-licences are the answer to that my friend . I'm out of brown paper bags!
The People's Hero Posted 18 September 2008 Posted 18 September 2008 I fall in to just about every category.
Lovejoy Posted 18 September 2008 Posted 18 September 2008 I'm going out to get lashed tonight as it's a load of my mates last night out before uni .
Guest Posted 18 September 2008 Posted 18 September 2008 So, if you drink for taste, if there was no alcohol in the drinks, would you still drink them? Yes, and I have tried non-alcoholic stuff, but it is not the same. As Manwell says, it does have a taste of its own.
Simi Posted 18 September 2008 Posted 18 September 2008 What a load of guff. Why do we have to be pigeon holed all the frigging time? I drink because I like the taste, simple as. Well said. I hate all this bollocks about "New research shows 8/10 people..." It's all bollocks, seriously who gives a ****. Get on with it.
BigGibbo Posted 18 September 2008 Posted 18 September 2008 Well said.I hate all this bollocks about "New research shows 8/10 people..." It's all bollocks, seriously who gives a ****. Get on with it. Yes but, without all this money wasted on nonsensical research we wouldn't have 8 Out Of 10 Cats, so swings & roundabouts!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.