Lineker's Left Foot Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 I know the names of the other two people who tortured Baby P... I don't know whether to release the link however as there maybe reprisals for me???
James. Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 I know the names of the other two people who tortured Baby P... I don't know whether to release the link however as there maybe reprisals for me??? If it's a publicly available internet site why would there be reprisals for you? I'm not saying there wouldn't be, I just don't know why there would be.
stez Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 if they're not publicly available, i'm not sure this is the place to name anyone, and if you do the thread will be deleted
Guest Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 If the decision not to name them was made by the courts, then to publically announce them would you mean you are in contempt of court. It is a serious matter.
Corky Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 I know the names of the other two people who tortured Baby P... I don't know whether to release the link however as there maybe reprisals for me??? I wouldn't risk it if I were you- you never know what might happen to you if you did.
Lineker's Left Foot Posted 17 November 2008 Author Posted 17 November 2008 Thanks for your opinions anyway guys !! It's just I want to tell the whole world so that this filth gets what's coming to them
fox123 Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 I believe there are Facebook groups naming and shaming them. For the curious.
Katy Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 Hmmm as stated above, the names of these inhumans are plastered all over Facebook. Words fail me.
fox123 Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 for the curious sun reader Try Google news and learn something!
Uncle Monty Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 Shit yeah, you are right, what was i thinking ? Maybe an angry mob would be a better idea, come on lets go down to b&q and get the pitchforks - no time to loose we can get all the peados on the way aswell.
skinnydipper Posted 17 November 2008 Posted 17 November 2008 Whilst desperately searching for scapegoats the government is not without blame , having raised the cost to local authorities of initiating protective measures for children in the courts from £100 per case to £2250. http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/nov...uthorities-fees Following the increase there was a 30% fall nationally in the issue of proceedings in which Local Authorities take action to protect vulnerable children (reported to be as high as a 70% decrease in some areas) Considering the improbability of child abusers ceasing to be child abusers at precisely the same time that the government disincentivise Local Authorities from protecting children it's hard to believe the government when it claims to be doing all it can to protect children in need
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.