Dylan Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 I don't think there has to be too much changes, but i'd like to see Oakley dropped. I think he has been poor. I'd go with something like- Weale** Morrison - Brown - Hobbs - BernerSolano* - King - AdamsGallagher - - - - - - - - - - DyerWaghorn *If fit enough to start. If not then Wellens in holding-centre role, with King centre-right. **If fit enough to start. If not then Logan. Subs- Logan/Pentney, Bruce, McGivern, Nguessan, Solano/Wellens, Kermorgant, Howard. Id like to stick with 4-3-3/4-5-1 system. Its working really well for us IMO. Again I say, Oakley must be dropped for me.
davieG Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 Weale Morrison - Brown - Hobbs - BernerKing - Gallagher - WellensN'Guessan - - - - - - - - - - DyerWaghorn
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 Weale/Logan Morrison Brown Hobbs Berner Oakley King Gallagher N'Guessan Dyer Waghorn
FoxyPV Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 Weale if fit morrsion brown hobbs berner king wellens solano / Adams gallagher Dyer Waghorn (N'guessan to come off the bench and score to win the game for us.)
Guest Mee-9 Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 I'd still stick with the same side. Weale Morrison Brown Hobbs Berner Oakley Wellens King Gallagher Dyer Waghorn.
Joe. Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 Weale Morrison --- Hobbs --- Brown --- Berner Gallagher --- King --- Wellens N'Guessan --- Waghorn --- Dyer
Ash Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 Weale Morrison - Hobbs - Berner Wellens Gallagher- King-Solano-Adams NGuessen - Waghorn
The Doctor Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 Weale/Pentney Morrison Brown Hobbs Berner King Oakley Wellens Gallagher Waghorn Dyer Subs: Pentney/Logan, Neilson, Bruce, Solano, Adams, Kermorgant, N'guessan
Fox You Forest Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 Weale Morrison - Brown - Hobbs - BernerKing - Gallagher - WellensN'Guessan - - - - - - - - - - DyerWaghorn Yep, same for me. Dany has to come back in.
SMX11 Posted 9 March 2010 Posted 9 March 2010 GK: Weale DR: Morrison DC: Hobbs DC: Brown DL: Berner AMC: Wellens AMC: King DMC: Papa Boupa Diop (the rumours better be true) WL: Dyer WR: Gally ST: Waghorn Would be very tempted to play galley in the centre of midfield and N'guessan of right.
Simo86 Posted 10 March 2010 Posted 10 March 2010 GK: Weale DR: Morrison DC: Hobbs DC: Brown DL: Berner AMC: Wellens AMC: King DMC: Papa Boupa Diop (the rumours better be true) WL: Dyer WR: Gally ST: Waghorn Would be very tempted to play galley in the centre of midfield and N'guessan of right. Diop? Where did you hear that?
Guest Basildon Fox Posted 10 March 2010 Posted 10 March 2010 I'd still stick with the same side. Weale Morrison Brown Hobbs Berner Oakley Wellens King Gallagher Dyer Waghorn. I agree. Cardiff play attacking footaball and that formation and side seem to have had good results against teams prepared to have a go so it would be a little harsh to drop anybody on the back of one bad result.
davieG Posted 11 March 2010 Posted 11 March 2010 Does Vaughan signal a return to the dreadful (for us) 442.
Simo86 Posted 11 March 2010 Posted 11 March 2010 Weale Morrison Berner Brown Hobbs King Wellens Waghorn Gallagher N'Guessan Vaughan Subs- Logan, Oakley, Dyer, Bruce, Kermorgant, Howard, Solano
dogadug Posted 11 March 2010 Posted 11 March 2010 Could Vaughan play on the right side of the front 3, and is he fit enough? If so: Weale Morrison Brown Hobbs Berner Gallagher King Wellens Vaughan Dyer Waghorn
SMX11 Posted 11 March 2010 Posted 11 March 2010 I think NP will bring in another player before the week. If the Diop rumour (from 606/Leicester Mercury website) is true then NP is looking for physical tough tackling midfielder, which was a major reason why we didn't get a result against the Owls imo. Sorry for the double post before.
Simo86 Posted 11 March 2010 Posted 11 March 2010 I think NP will bring in another player before the week. If the Diop rumour (from 606/Leicester Mercury website) is true then NP is looking for physical tough tackling midfielder, which was a major reason why we didn't get a result against the Owls imo. Sorry for the double post before. Diop would be a very good signing if the rumour is true!
Donut Posted 11 March 2010 Posted 11 March 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Weale Morrison-------------------------------------Brown ------------------------------Hobbs-----------------------------------------Berner ----------------------------------Gallagher-------------------------Wellens---------------------------------King --------------Vaughan-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dyer --------------- -------------------------------------------------Waghorniesta
Dylan Posted 11 March 2010 Author Posted 11 March 2010 I think Vaughan should be on subs instead of Howard. Still play 4-3-3 as i wrote earlier. And then around 60-70, sub him on for Waghorn (unless Waghorn's playing absolutely brilliant).
mmarkie Posted 12 March 2010 Posted 12 March 2010 Weale Morrison Hobbs Brown© Berner Gallagher Wellens King Dyer Vaughan Waghorn
Ozwin Posted 12 March 2010 Posted 12 March 2010 Does Vaughan signal a return to the dreadful (for us) 442. Weren't you wingeing about 4-5-1/4-3-3 the other day? What do you want?
davieG Posted 12 March 2010 Posted 12 March 2010 Weren't you wingeing about 4-5-1/4-3-3 the other day? What do you want? Not me, unless it was in my sleep. With our midfield trio I've always been in favour of 433, not so keen on a 451.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.