Svens view of the 2nd half v Millwall

[corbyfox1884]

Was anybody else slightly taken aback by Sven's comment on BBC Radio Leic when he said that we were better in the 2nd half ?

Did he not realise that we lost the 2nd half 0-1 against a team who are going to struggle to stay in the championship this season?We never looked like scoring as the final ball was always wasteful.

Are we really any better than 2 years ago under Pearson when we spent next to nothing? I dint think so !!

[Yojoe36]

He said we were better. Not good

[Bugg]

We were better in the second half, but that wasn't hard after the woeful first half.

[Dan]

I thought both were equally as bad to be honest. 90 minutes of failing to break down a poor side.

[Corky]

We looked a bit better with Dyer, but the second half didn't give me a lot of hope for the future if it was better.

[Kitchandro]

I actually thought we were decent 2nd half, at least we went for it. Hit the bar, created a few chances. If we'd have played like that in the whole game I think we'd have won. The big problem by then was we had no confidence and no natural goalscorer to get in the box. I think some players (especially the midfielders) gave up somewhat, but tbf Dyer terrorised their defence and Nugent created some openings as well. It was the first half that lost us the game, not the second.

But that's just the problem, we don't get going until it's too late, too often. It was disgraceful attitude in the first half and, as at Birmingham, we deserved to lose because of that.

[Thracian]

I actually thought we were decent 2nd half, at least we went for it. Hit the bar, created a few chances. If we'd have played like that in the whole game I think we'd have won. The big problem by then was we had no confidence and no natural goalscorer to get in the box. I think some players (especially the midfielders) gave up somewhat, but tbf Dyer terrorised their defence and Nugent created some openings as well. It was the first half that lost us the game, not the second.

But that's just the problem, we don't get going until it's too late, too often. It was disgraceful attitude in the first half and, as at Birmingham, we deserved to lose because of that.

(Apart from not sticking those second half chances in the net of course.

[Fox92]

Are we really any better than 2 years ago under Pearson when we spent next to nothing? I dint think so !!

I agree, no we are not. Pearson had the team organised. The back four looked solid, and we played with width. I often went into games, even thougher games, confident, where as I don't seem to be at the minute.

Sven doesn't seem to have the team organised and thats worrying. Millwall spent little money and are in the bottom regions of the table, yet they came to Leicester yesterday and looked as organised and as solid as any team I have seen this season.