Craig Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Good to see that he's been convicted by FT (and declared one of the worst human beings alive) before any indication has been given as to whether he's actually been charged for the offence... As he's been taken to hospital it's more than likely that he'll have had to have provided sample of blood. The result won't be known for weeks.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 For once, I kinda agree with Stu. What he (Johnson) did was reckless and stupid, but people are being far too quick to judge him and loosing sight of their own flaws. If you've had a couple of pints the night before and then driven the following morning - you're over the limit and are technically drink-driving. It may be semantics, but if you've done so (as I imagine many have), then to cast such critisms on Johnson is slightly hypocritical no? Precisely Go down to Derby Road playing fields on a Sunday morning and 90% of the drivers there will be over the limit
Soar Fox Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Precisely Go down to Derby Road playing fields on a Sunday morning and 90% of the drivers there will be over the limit Exactly. Me and some lads who I play football with always say if the police want to catch people drink driving all they have to do is sit outside a a few football pitches every Sunday morning and they'll catch a lot of people.
Daggers Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Surely you only get arrested for drink driving if you fail a breath test...thereby proving guilt of the offense?
The Year Of The Fox Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Surely you only get arrested for drink driving if you fail a breath test...thereby proving guilt of the offense? Yes, but it still goes to court
The Year Of The Fox Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Exactly. Me and some lads who I play football with always say if the police want to catch people drink driving all they have to do is sit outside a a few football pitches every Sunday morning and they'll catch a lot of people. Do you play in the charnwood leagues?
Craig Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Surely you only get arrested for drink driving if you fail a breath test...thereby proving guilt of the offense? Not always.
Soar Fox Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Do you play in the charnwood leagues? No mate play for Advance Couriers and St Andrews
Daggers Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Not always. Do you know of anyone who has failed a breath/blood test at the police station recently who has not been found guilty of driving with over the legal amount of alcohol in the blood? I'm not aware of it happening.
Soar Fox Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Do you know of anyone who has failed a breath/blood test at the police station recently who has not been found guilty of driving with over the legal amount of alcohol in the blood? I'm not aware of it happening. My cousins friend got to the police station after being arrested of drink driving and he asked for a blood test by the time the doctor arrived the alcohol level in his blood had gone down so he got let off.
Daggers Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 My cousins friend got to the police station after being arrested of drink driving and he asked for a blood test by the time the doctor arrived the alcohol level in his blood had gone down so he got let off. Which hasn't happened in this case which is why he is reported as being arrested and not de-arrested.
Craig Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Do you know of anyone who has failed a breath/blood test at the police station recently who has not been found guilty of driving with over the legal amount of alcohol in the blood? I'm not aware of it happening. You get arrested if you fail a 'roadside' breath test (this test holds no evidential value), or if they have reasonable suspicion to believe that you may have been drinking but aren't able to breathalyse you at the roadside. I can think of a fair few cases where a person has been arrested on suspicion of drink driving and then has then gone on to provide a good sample on the Police Station intoximeter.
Daggers Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 You get arrested if you fail a 'roadside' breath test (this test holds no evidential value), or if they have reasonable suspicion to believe that you may have been drinking but aren't able to breathalyse you at the roadside. I can think of a fair few cases where a person has been arrested on suspicion of drink driving and then has then gone on to provide a good sample on the Police Station intoximeter. Yes, and is then de-arrested...but Johnson wasn't, that's my point - ergo, he was over the limit at the station too and was therefore pissed.
ADK Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Surprised at the number of people who don't seem too bothered by drink driving. It really does lead to alot of accidents/deaths on the roads.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Surprised at the number of people who don't seem too bothered by drink driving. It really does lead to alot of accidents/deaths on the roads. It does if you're driving like the idiots on road wars. Having two pints doesnt make you do that
Craig Posted 2 June 2012 Posted 2 June 2012 Yes, and is then de-arrested...but Johnson wasn't, that's my point - ergo, he was over the limit at the station too and was therefore pissed. No, because Johnson would have had to have provided a blood sample at hospital as they don't have intoximeters, hence why there's no reports as or wether he's been charged or not. He'll be reported for summons if over the limit, but it will take months.
Danny the Fox 95 Posted 3 June 2012 Posted 3 June 2012 Complete waste. Looked like he had potential when he was younger. I think Man City will release him and he'll end up at a league one or lower championship side. One of the joke signings of last season along with Ball. Shame Fernandes never stayed, really thought he was our best player
Daggers Posted 3 June 2012 Posted 3 June 2012 No, because Johnson would have had to have provided a blood sample at hospital as they don't have intoximeters, hence why there's no reports as or wether he's been charged or not. He'll be reported for summons if over the limit, but it will take months. Point taken, that's the answer I was looking for - thanks.
Haydos Posted 3 June 2012 Posted 3 June 2012 £1m it cost us an absolute farce by Sven and co. Captain Hindsight to the rescue.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.